13.07.2015 Views

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38in Research, Development <strong>and</strong> Technical Design (RTD) activities. For example, thestudies on bentonite buffer are likely to provide new in<strong>for</strong>mation on buffer behaviourunder different flow conditions <strong>and</strong> chemical environments. Furthermore, developmentof the backfill concept <strong>and</strong> selection of the backfill material may cause changes toper<strong>for</strong>mance targets <strong>for</strong> geosphere.An area that requires further evaluation is that of mechanical disturbances in tunnels <strong>and</strong>deposition holes. Prediction of the probability of rock damage along the tunnel ispresented in the latest Site Descriptive Model report (<strong>Posiva</strong> 2009a), <strong>and</strong> estimates onthe spalling are reported by Hakala et al. (2008). In the current state, resolution of thesepredictions is not yet such that numerical tunnel or deposition hole scale criteria can beproposed. It might be possible to suppress the initiation of thermally induced spalling byengineering solutions <strong>and</strong> even if such spalling was to occur it may still be acceptablefrom a safety point of view. Furthermore, the uncertainties in spalling strength, reflectedby uncertainty in the estimated extent of spalling (both depth <strong>and</strong> area of the damages aswell as potential number of deposition holes affected), call <strong>for</strong> further study. Theongoing construction of ONKALO will provide data at relevant depths. Predictions onmechanical damage are also being developed. Currently, further development of thecriteria <strong>for</strong> buffer/rock <strong>and</strong> backfill/rock interfaces is taking place, however theserequirements are likely to concern mainly the buffer <strong>and</strong> are not expected to affect therequirements on the host rock to great extent. Properties at the buffer rock interfacewere a key issue in the KBS-3H safety assessment (Smith et al. 2007a, c).The per<strong>for</strong>mance targets defined here <strong>for</strong>m a basis in developing rock suitability criteria<strong>for</strong> the host rock (see Chapter 5). The rock suitability criteria translate these generalrequirements to observable <strong>and</strong> measurable (either directly or indirectly) properties ofthe host rock that can be verified by means of interpretation <strong>and</strong> modelling. Consideringthe set of per<strong>for</strong>mance targets listed in the Table 4-3, the following are taken asguidelines <strong>for</strong> criteria development:per<strong>for</strong>mance targets affecting the criteria <strong>for</strong> deposition holes are essentiallyones related to inflow, i.e. low flow rate around the deposition holes which isalso linked to transport resistance, <strong>and</strong> to limited rock shear in the depositionholes,criteria related to groundwater chemistry, retention <strong>and</strong> thermal propertiesshould be considered <strong>for</strong> rock volumes hosting the deposition tunnels, <strong>and</strong>criteria related to limited mechanical disturbances need to be developed whenmore in<strong>for</strong>mation is gained from ONKALO at relevant depths.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!