13.07.2015 Views

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

RSC-Programme - Interim Report. Approach and Basis for - Posiva

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42fulfillment of the per<strong>for</strong>mance targets presented in Table 4.3 in Chapter 4. Thus thesefeatures are considered as part of the rock suitability criteria presented in Section 5.3.Per<strong>for</strong>mance targets <strong>for</strong> the host rock were presented in Chapter 4, Table 4-3. Layoutdetermining features are those where high groundwater flow can cause unfavourablechanges in groundwater chemistry, such as upconing of saline water <strong>and</strong> intrusion ofglacial melt waters, thus affecting many per<strong>for</strong>mance targets related to chemicalcomposition of the groundwater. These high groundwater flow zones provide hardly anytransport resistance <strong>and</strong> should there<strong>for</strong>e be far enough from the deposition holes.Another reason <strong>for</strong> defining a zone as layout determining is to find the potential offuture (post glacial) zone faulting. The project of layout determining features <strong>and</strong>respect distances concerns mainly the following per<strong>for</strong>mance targets <strong>and</strong> their limitvalues. Hence only consideration of layout determining features <strong>and</strong> respect distancevolumes is insufficient to fulfil these per<strong>for</strong>mance targets, but smaller scale criteriapresented in Section 5.3 are also required.Salinity should be less than the target valueo < 70 g/L (TDS, total dissolved solids)Inflow to deposition holes should be less than the target valueo < 0.1 L/min (corresponding to T ~ 10 -9 ...10 -8 m 2 /s <strong>for</strong> single fracture)Flow around deposition holes should be limitedo in the order of 1 L/year (defined as flow over width of 1 m)Transport resistance (WL/Q) in the vicinity of the deposition holes should behigh enougho in the order of few thous<strong>and</strong> of years per metreRock shear in deposition hole should be less than the target valueo < 10 cmRespect distance determines a volume surrounding the layout determining feature thatshould be avoided in order to maintain per<strong>for</strong>mance targets <strong>for</strong> long-term safety of therepository. This volume is called respect distance volume. Defining respect distance <strong>for</strong>a layout determining feature dem<strong>and</strong>s an intermediate step, which is establishing aninfluence zone <strong>for</strong> the feature. Respect distance should be large enough to set a safeenvironment <strong>for</strong> disposal, taking into account the uncertainties in location <strong>and</strong> propertiesof the layout determining features. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, it should be optimised so thatgood rock volumes are not unnecessarily lost. This work is based on the assumption thatvolumes around the faults or hydrogeological zones are the most influenced byde<strong>for</strong>mations <strong>and</strong> are also less competent <strong>for</strong> hosting the deposition holes. This volumeof rock is called an influence zone. The respect distance volume around the fault orhydrogeological zone is basically defined by the influence zone, with a few exceptions.In addition, single faults <strong>and</strong> large fractures, either transmissive or prone to slipping,should be avoided outside the influence zone. This is considered as part of the rocksuitability criteria presented in Section 5.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!