13.07.2015 Views

A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development of the 21st Century

A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development of the 21st Century

A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development of the 21st Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shanghai Manual – A <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainable</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> in <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> <strong>Century</strong>which closes major avenues <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city and allows only bicycles, pedestrians and anynon-motorized mode to ride along <strong>the</strong>m. This 121-km network served as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>policies that would inadvertently increase bicycle use as a transport mode whenproper policies were implemented after 1998.Caption: Taking children to school on a cargo bicycle is very common in Copenhagen, as aremany o<strong>the</strong>r daily activities in this city which has promoted bicycle use <strong>for</strong> more than 40 years.Photo by Carlos Felipe PardoThe city <strong>of</strong> Copenhagen is, as many o<strong>the</strong>r European cities, one where population is not solarge (1.2 million) and density is adequate at 2,632 inhabitants per square meter. Bicycleshave always been a part <strong>of</strong> Copenhagen life since <strong>the</strong> 19 th century, and <strong>the</strong> second worldwar increased substantially this level <strong>of</strong> bicycle use. It was only in <strong>the</strong> post-war era until1960 that cars dominated urban policies and were given precedence over o<strong>the</strong>r modes <strong>of</strong>transport. 27 The turning point in its transportation policy came with <strong>the</strong> oil crisis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>early 1970s, and <strong>the</strong> growing traffic congestion. The plan to address <strong>the</strong>se issues not onlyredirected <strong>the</strong> transport policy but also <strong>the</strong>ir urban redevelopment plans. It must also beemphasized that cities like Copenhagen a high GDP per capita choose bicycles not just<strong>for</strong> economical reasons but also <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir great efficiency and various co-benefits.Both cities faced considerable challenges around <strong>the</strong> time that <strong>the</strong>ir policies and projectsshifted to develop a more bicycle-oriented approach. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Bogotá, <strong>the</strong> challengewas to cope with increasing transport demand and congestion, <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> an improvedoverall transport system and <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> cheap, reliable modes <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>entire population. This challenge was seen as an opportunity by Enrique Peñalosa, whowas mayor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city from 1998 to 2000. He took <strong>the</strong> enormous political risk to reduce<strong>the</strong> investment related to private automobiles and redirect <strong>the</strong> entire transport policy toone where people would be at <strong>the</strong> center and infrastructure would be developed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>m,27 City <strong>of</strong> Copenhagen (2009). City <strong>of</strong> Cyclists: Copenhagen bicycle life.21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!