13.07.2015 Views

Samdhinirmocana-sutra

Samdhinirmocana-sutra

Samdhinirmocana-sutra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 11being, for they have indeed been able to expunge them. It is notthe case that those who have gained insight into truth have beenincapable of liberation from bondage to the images of conditionedstates of being, for they have indeed been capable of such liberation.It is not the case that those who have gained insight intotruth have been incapable of liberation from bondage to grossweaknesses, for they have indeed been capable of such liberation.It is precisely because they have been capable of liberation fromthese two obstacles that they have been able to attain the quiescentcessation of supreme skill and to realize full, perfect wisdom.Therefore, the opinion that the descriptive marks of the truth ofultimate meaning are entirely different from the descriptive marksof conditioned states of being is not reasonable. If some say thatthe marks of the truth of ultimate meaning are entirely differentfrom the marks of conditioned states of being, from the above argumentyou should understand that this opinion is neither intelligentnor truly reasonable."Moreover, Suvisuddhimati, if the marks of the truth of ultimatemeaning were identical with the marks of conditioned statesof being, then, just as the marks of conditioned states of being aredefiled, so also the marks of the truth of ultimate meaning wouldbe defiled. Suvisuddhimati, if the marks of the truth of ultimatemeaning were entirely different from the marks of conditionedstates of being, then the common mark that describes conditionedstates of being could not be termed the mark of the truth of ultimatemeaning. But, Suvisuddhimati, the descriptive marks of thetruth of ultimate meaning are not defiled, and the common marksof conditioned states of being are termed the mark of the truth ofultimate meaning. Therefore it is not reasonable to say that thedescriptive marks of the truth of ultimate meaning are identicalwith the descriptive marks of conditioned states of being, nor thatthey are entirely different one from the other. From this argumentyou should understand that both those who speak for theidentity of marks and those who speak for their complete differenceare neither intelligent nor reasonable.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!