American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine <strong>Proceedings</strong> J Ultrasound Med 32(suppl):S1–S134, 2013will perform ultrasound scans on a group of standardized ultrasound patients.The ultrasound scans will be evaluated using the USAT by 3 ultrasound-credentialedfaculty evaluators from emergency medicine, criticalcare, and radiology, who will be blinded to the identity of the scanners. TheUSAT will then be evaluated for reliability.Results—A specific USAT has been developed for each coreemergency ultrasound application. Ultrasound scans for evaluation arebeing performed.Conclusions—The need for a standardized method to both objectivelyevaluate the quality of an ultrasound image and provide distinctdifferentiation between skill levels of ultrasound users is well documented.The USAT represents one of the first attempts to provide objective assessmentof ultrasound images. We anticipate that the USAT will be avaluable resource to assess the current skills of sonographers and followthe development of these skills over time.1540597 Mid or Late Second-Trimester Doppler Ultrasound of theUterine Artery: Is There a Difference?Koen Deurloo, 1 * John van Vugt, 2 Annemieke Bolte, 3 MartijnHeymans 4 1 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakonessenhuis,Utrecht, the Netherlands; 2 Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;3 Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4 Clinical Epidemiology andBiostatics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, theNetherlandsObjectives—Uterine artery (UA) Doppler measurements forscreening for hypertensive complications in pregnancy is usually performedat 22 to 24 weeks of gestation. However, most routine targetedultrasound examinations are performed at 19 to 21 weeks of gestation.It would be convenient to include the UA Doppler measurement in theroutine targeted ultrasound; therefore, we studied the correlation of UADoppler measurements at 19 to 21 and 22 to 24 weeks of gestation.Methods—Ninety-seven primigravidas with uncomplicatedsingleton pregnancies were analyzed. Combined UA velocity waveformswere assessed using transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound between 19and 24 weeks of gestation. The resistance index (RI) was calculated forleft and right UAs, and the results were averaged as a combined US RI.After log transformation of the US RI variable, the results were analyzedwith linear regression models and corrected for known confounders (ethnicity,assisted reproductive technology, age, body mass index, and smoking).Unpaired t testing was used to assess the correlation between UA RIsbetween 19 and 21 and 22 and 24 weeks of gestation.Results—Adequate UA velocity waveforms were assessed inall cases. There was no confounding demonstrated for the known confounders.Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation (r =0.79) between mid and late second-trimester UA Doppler measurements(P < .05).Conclusions—RIs of blood velocity waveforms of the UA at19 to 21 and 22 to 24 weeks of gestation are strongly correlated, and UADoppler measurements might be included in the routine targeted ultrasoundat 19 to 21 weeks of gestation. Further research is needed to assessits screening performance.1540605 Simulation Model as an Adjunct Method for EmergencyMedicine Transvaginal Ultrasound EducationOmar Corujo Vazquez,* Marie Romney, Penelope ChunLema, Cara Brown, Michael Radeos, Eric Tran, Anita DattaEmergency Medicine, New York Hospital Queens, Flushing,New York USAObjectives—This study assessed the importance of a mannequinsimulator model as an addition to a didactic lecture in point-ofcarepelvic ultrasound. We hypothesized an improvement in ultrasoundknowledge, technique, satisfaction, and confidence for residents exposedto the simulation model.S109Methods—First-year residents in emergency medicine wereenrolled in a prospective cohort study to assess an educational intervention.Subjects were randomly divided into a didactic-only group (group A)or didactic combined with simulation group (group B). Both groups receiveddidactic education. Group B received additional hands-on ultrasoundsimulation training with the Combination IUP Ectopic PregnancyTransvaginal Ultrasound Training Model (Blue Phantom, Redmond, WA).Both groups were evaluated by a written test and an objective structuredclinical exam (OSCE) on pelvic ultrasound before and after the intervention.A survey was given to assess resident satisfaction and confidence.Results—Group B increased their pretest to posttest writtenscore by 50% compared to group A (32% vs 21% median increase) but didnot reach statistical significance (P = .074). Group B increased their pretestto posttest OSCE score when compared to group A (31% vs 29.9% median),but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .92). Prior tothe course, 90% of the subjects reported feeling “not at all comfortable”with performing and interpreting normal pelvic ultrasound examinations.After the course, this number decreased to 30% and reached statistical significance(P = .002). When analysis was performed from group B independently,80% of subjects were either “very comfortable” or “extremelycomfortable” performing transvaginal ultrasound after the intervention.Conclusions—Simulation combined with didactic training maybe superior for resident satisfaction and confidence in point-of-care pelvicultrasound teaching. Although there was improvement in knowledge andtechnique, a larger study is needed on the use of simulation training in residenteducation to show significance.1540609 Analysis of Uniformity Artifacts Detected During ClinicalUltrasound Quality ControlScott Stekel,* Nicholas Hangiandreou, Donald TradupRadiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USAObjectives—Characterize trends in severity ratings of observedtransducer uniformity artifacts.Methods—We reviewed the results of quarterly quality control(QC) uniformity testing for the previous ≈2 years and characterized theevaluation history of all transducers exhibiting artifacts of any severity.Our evaluation protocol is able to reveal subtle transducer artifacts. All artifactswere scored by a single author (D.T.) using a subjective severityscale. Uniformity artifacts attributed to scanner defects were excludedfrom this analysis.Results—A total of 58 probes with artifacts of varying severity,observed at QC between March 2010 and August 2012, were analyzed.These included probes that exhibited critical artifacts (failed, withscore F), as well as those that did not fail but exhibited at least 2 successivesubcritical artifact scores (P1, P2, or P3).Thirty-one of these 58 probes failed (score F). Twenty-two ofthe 31 failing scores (71%) directly followed a prior QC assessment witha passing score (score P, no artifact seen). Only 9 failures (29%) were directlypreceded by ≥1 subcritical scores. The time between the first subcriticalscore and the failure ranged from 3 to 14 months, with a mean of9.1 months. No reliable trend of progressively worsening subcritical scoresending in failure was seen (the numbers of probe failures with prior improving,stable, and worsening subcritical scores were 2, 7, and 0, respectively).Twenty-seven of the 58 probes with subcritical scores have notfailed. Two of these artifacts spontaneously resolved, returning to scoresof P. The remaining 25 artifacts were observed up to the last recorded QCsession. The time duration of these subcritical artifacts ranged from 0.5 to16.5 months, with a mean of 10.5 months. No reliable trend of progressivelyworsening subcritical scores was seen (the numbers of these probeswith improving, stable, and worsening subcritical scores were 5, 18, and3, respectively).Conclusions—These subjective artifact data are not consistentwith a model of initial minor defects progressively increasing in severityuntil failure occurs. We are working on methods to objectively score artifactseverity, which should allow a more sensitive analysis of artifact behavior.
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine <strong>Proceedings</strong> J Ultrasound Med 32(suppl):S1–S134, 20131540628 Carotid Plaque Classification System: A New StandardDiagnostic CriterionLysa Legault Kingstone, 1,2 * Carlos Torres, 1 Geoffrey Currie 21Diagnostic Imaging, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario,Canada; 2 School of Dentistry and Health Sciences, CharlesSturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, AustraliaObjectives—2D and 3D ultrasound (US) for carotid plaque imagingcan provide valuable information on the morphology. Particularsonographic features of the plaque have been recognized as the foundationfor stroke. Carotid plaque imaging is increasingly recognized as being asimportant as stenotic grading; however, various methods of echographicimage standardization have been described. Standard plaque analysis andcharacterization are lacking, and, to our knowledge, no global classificationsystem or form of image standardization exists. Our objective was todevelop a standard US characterization method and reporting system forcarotid atherosclerotic lesions.Methods—We created and implemented a quality assurancetool for plaque classification criteria in an effort to globalize image and reportingstandardization without the use of complex or expensive software.US images were subjectively graded using a standardized classification reportform that combines echographic image features. Three categoricalgroups were defined according to risk of vulnerability: type A (low risk),type B (moderate risk), and type C (high risk). Accuracy of the method wasdetermined by measuring the agreement of plaque characterization usingstandardized US images and comparing inter-observer agreement andinter-reader reliabilities. In addition, highly vulnerable plaques incorporatedRadpath correlation.Results—At the time of submission, final data analysis wasbeing completed. Preliminary results indicate that our plaque classificationsystem provided excellent sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,negative predictive value, and accuracy.Conclusions—Our standardized classification system has allowedus to improve the consistency and accuracy of plaque characterizationimaging and assessment without of the use of computed orautomated methodologies. This plaque analysis criterion may help promotethe use of a standard global US classification analysis and uniformreporting for carotid atherosclerotic lesions. Large-scale studies are requiredto fully assess the potential of this grading system.1540646 A Decade of Ultrasound Practice Accreditation at CaliforniaPrenatal Diagnosis Centers and Experience With FetalEchocardiography AccreditationSara Goldman Genetic Disease Screening Program, CaliforniaDepartment of Public Health, Richmond, California USAObjectives—Monitor the ultrasound practice accreditation andreaccreditation at prenatal diagnosis centers (PDCs) from 2001 to 2011and fetal echocardiography accreditation since April 2011.Methods—All PDCs were required to achieve obstetric (OB)ultrasound practice accreditation by 2000. By March 2012, Fetal echo–approvedPDCs were required to apply for fetal echocardiography accreditationwith the <strong>AIUM</strong> or Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditationof Echocardiography Laboratories (ICAEL).Results—In 2001, 50 ultrasound practices (65 %) had achieved<strong>AIUM</strong> accreditation; 17 practices (22%) were in the process of achieving<strong>AIUM</strong> accreditation; and 10 practices (13%) had chosen American Collegeof Radiology (ACR) accreditation. In 2011, there were a total of 80ultrasound practices at 141 PDC sites. Seventy-five practices (94%) hadachieved <strong>AIUM</strong> accreditation, and 5 ultrasound practices had chosen ACRaccreditation. On average, 18 ultrasound practices achieve reaccreditationeach year. In March 2012, 34 ultrasound or pediatric cardiology practicessubmitted a fetal echocardiography accreditation application representing56 PDC sites, and 18 (53%) practices are currently accredited by either the<strong>AIUM</strong> or ICAEL representing 30 PDC sites.Conclusions—A requirement for OB ultrasound practice accreditationat PDCs and fetal echocardiography accreditation at fetal echo–approved PDCs is achievable through monitoring of the reaccreditationprogress.1540658 Medical Student Ultrasound Education as Part of theClinical Skills Immersion ExperienceZachary Robinson, 1 Colin Turney, 1 Creagh Boulger, 2 DavidBahner 2 *1 Ohio State University College of Medicine,Columbus, Ohio USA; 2 Emergency Medicine, Wexner MedicalCenter, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USAObjectives—Focused ultrasound (US) allows physicians toquickly obtain high-quality, cost-effective images. While the technologyhas advanced, education in ultrasound has lagged at the graduate medicaleducation and medical student levels. Over the last several years, OhioState has emerged as a leader in ultrasound education by teaching focusedUS to medical students. US has been integrated into the Clinical SkillsImmersion Experience (CSIE), a unique 7-day course providing third-yearmedical students with experience in a variety of procedural and imagingtechniques.Methods—The CSIE curriculum consists of a series of lecturesand workshops over a variety of clinical skills. As part of this curriculum,we conducted a 3-hour session on focused ultrasound, which includedpelvic, aorta, and cardiac imaging, as well as evaluation of lung sliding andthe focused assessment with sonography for trauma scan. The session includeda brief lecture on basic US principles followed by extensive handsonexperience. After the session, students completed a survey evaluatingtheir skills with US using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = low skill leveland 5 = highly skilled. They were also asked how well the session improvedtheir understanding of ultrasound, where 1 = not at all and 5 =greatly improved.Results—Ten of 38 students responded to the survey for theAugust session (response rate, 26%). Nine of 10 respondents had performed