13.07.2015 Views

Official Proceedings - AIUM

Official Proceedings - AIUM

Official Proceedings - AIUM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine <strong>Proceedings</strong> J Ultrasound Med 32(suppl):S1–S134, 2013for further care. There were 6 of 11 deaths in the 1990 group vs 2 of 8deaths in 2000.Conclusions—The outcome of NIH cases improved in the laterdecade. The commonest etiology continues to be idiopathic.Table 1. Prenatal and Neonatal Characteristics1990–1999 (n = 11) 2000–2010 (n = 8)Mean GA at diagnosis, wk 31 29Ascites on US, % 63 75GA at delivery, wk 31 31BW, g 2018 2560Idiopathic etiology, % 27 50Survival >28 d, % 46 75Mortality, % 54 251528272 Qualitative Performance of Fetal Magnetic ResonanceImaging Compared to Ultrasound in Cases of MultipleFetal AnomaliesChristina Herrera,* Amber Samuel, Sherelle Laifer-Narin,Lynn Simpson, Russell Miller Obstetrics and Gynecology,Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York USAObjectives—Pregnancies complicated by multiple fetal anomaliesare a common indication for fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)as an adjunct to diagnostic ultrasound (US). This study investigated the diagnosticperformance of fetal MRI when compared to US alone for the accuratecharacterization of fetuses with multiple anomalies.Methods—In a retrospective review from 2003 to 2011 at a singletertiary care center, potential cases were identified if MRI was performedfollowing sonographic concern for multiple fetal anomalies.Inclusion required documented neonatal outcomes or postmortem assessments.Interstudy reliability between MRI and US was assessed by calculatingκ. Diagnostic accuracy of adjunct MRI compared to US alonewas assessed using qualitative statistics.Results—A total of 121 MRIs were performed due to antenatalsonographic concern for multiple fetal anomalies, of which 60 casespossessed documented neonatal or pathologic outcomes. The κ for MRIcompared with US was 0.28. The correct diagnosis was secured in 47%of cases by US and 50% of cases by MRI (Table 1). Nearly all inaccuratesonographic diagnoses were due to additional postnatal findings (48%).While MRI was most commonly inaccurate due to additional postnatalfindings (27%), discrepant postnatal findings (3%), discrepant and additionalpostnatal findings (13%), and false-positive imaging findings (5%)also contributed significantly to study inaccuracies.Conclusions—Agreement is poor between MRI and US for thecharacterization of fetuses with multiple anomalies. For either imagingmodality, complete and accurate diagnosis of fetal anomalies occurs inapproximately half of cases, with the majority of inaccuracies due to incompleteantenatal characterizations.Table 1US, n (%) MRI, n (%)Accurate diagnosis 28 (47) 30 (50)Additional anomalies discovered postnatally 29 (48) 16 (27)Discrepant findings between imaging and 2 (3) 2 (3)postnatal assessmentDiscrepant and additional anomalies 0 8 (13)False-positive imaging findings 1 (2) 3 (5)Study inconclusive 0 1 (2)S56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!