evaluation of general food distribution in northern uganda: gulu ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 6: Evaluation Tool/Question GuideNRC objectives andTOR objectivesRelevance andAppropriatenessTo contribute to household food security andmaintain the minimum nutritional and dietarystandards through food assistance to peopleaffected by displacementTo what extent has NRC food assistance contributedto sustain nutritional and dietary standards of IDPs -in response to their needs and demands and contextTo protect lives by providinghumanitarian food assistance to meetthe net food gapTO what extent have beneficiariesdemands and needs been addressed interms of meeting their net food gap?To safeguard fundamental rights to food forIDPs incl. Women, children, EVIsHow have beneficiaries been engaged in projectdevelopment and implementation – in order toensure everybody’s right to food?CoverageIs NRC’s approach to HOUSEHOLDS foodassistance in line with populations concerns?Is the FFL project in line with NRC’s distributionpolicy? (do no harm, timing, participation, culturalsensitivity, gender sensitivity, quality)NRC’s capacity (staffing and resources) to distributethe appropriate responseHow does NRC’s structure and organisationa l set upassist in providing relevant and appropriateassistanceIn view of the vast geographical context – how hasNRC’s efforts contributed to the total coverage andoutreach to people affected by displacementWhich standards have been followed tomeet the net food gap – have they beenappropriate?Is the FFL project the best solution toensure that the net food gap is met in thecurrent IDP situation?Participation of women in food managementcommittees, capacity building, training etc?How has NRC in its design and implementationclearly spelled out its concern and address ofissues regarding women, children and EVIsNRC’s capacity (staffing and resources ) todistribute the appropriate response to selectedtarget groupsTo what extent has NRC’s gender policy beenadhered to in implementation of the project?What percentage do women, children and EVIsmake up of the total target group and the extent towhich their needs have been addressed.EfficiencyHas NRC adjusted its focus, scope and coverage atdifferent stages of the project?NRC’s experience and capacity (material, human,financial) to distribute in the right place at the righttimeDeliveries, pipeline and local procurement – how hasit worked?Has the net food gap been met in the timeand with the resources available to NRCduring the project period?If not – why?How were the target groups defined and selectedHow would you describe NRC’s capacity (material,human, financial) to address the conditions ofwomen, children a nd EVIs in the right place at theright timeLessons learned?Timeliness?Effectiveness How has NRC defined objectives and activities for Has the net food gap been met? What are the concrete achievements and1
NRC objectives andTOR objectivesTo contribute to household food security andmaintain the minimum nutritional and dietarystandards through food assistance to peopleaffected by displacementthe food assistance? Are they clear and relevant?To what extent have activities been carried out asper plan?To what extent have objectives for household foodassistance been achieved?Challenges?Lessons learned?To protect lives by providinghumanitarian food assistance to meetthe net food gapTo what extent has the concrete objectivesbeen achieved ?Are beneficiaries satisfied with theassistance?Challenges?Lessons learned?To safeguard fundamental rights to food forIDPs incl. Women, children, EVIsoutcomes regarding ensuring the food rights ofwomen, children and EVIs?Female participation and leadership positions?Challenges?Success stories/Best practices?Lessons learned?CoordinationHow has the coordination between NRC and otherstakeholders (district, communities UN, NGOs) takenplace?Relevance of coordination (examples)?Do districts and other stakeholdersunderstand the approach and interventionsmade by NRC in addressing the net foodgap?Connectedness torelief and recoveryand Uganda’snational plansStrengths and weaknesses?To what extent has a linkage between relief andrecovery in terms of household food security beenmade?To what extent are the GoU and the district s able toensure that the IDPs minimum nutritional need arecovered after end of the FFL project?How does the NRC approach to providinghumanitarian food assistance link to thenational recovery plans (PRDP)SustainabilityImpactWhat has NRC done to ensu re sustainability(enhance productive capacity and self reliance ofpeople affected by displacement)?Impact according to indicators: distribution,malnutrition (gam), participation … vis a vis target?How has NRC planned for not onlyHOUSEHOLDS, but also vulnerable groupsin scaling up food security and livelihoodsinterventions to meet gradual reductio n infood distribution?Impact?2
Page 4 and 5:
List of Contents1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 6 and 7:
9.3 NRC’s Efforts Towards Connect
Page 8 and 9:
tools; however it ensures food secu
Page 10 and 11:
♦♦♦♦With the ration reducti
Page 12:
1.4 CoordinationNRC’s approach to
Page 15 and 16:
NRC coincided the field phase of th
Page 17 and 18:
Juba talks have been perceived as t
Page 19 and 20:
Table 2: 2004 Global Food Aid Deliv
Page 21 and 22:
4 PROTECTING THE RIGHT TO FOOD - TH
Page 23 and 24: 5 PROJECT RELEVANCE & APPROPRIATENE
Page 25 and 26: 5.3 Lesson Learned♦♦♦‘Being
Page 27 and 28: schedules and working long hours to
Page 29 and 30: The complaints about the failed ver
Page 31 and 32: 7 PROJECT EFFECTIVENESSHaving asses
Page 33 and 34: most and mothers observed the nutri
Page 35 and 36: 7.1.7 Lesson Learned♦ Food aid ha
Page 37 and 38: By 2005 the profile of the crisis i
Page 39 and 40: Recent studies 95 on global food se
Page 41 and 42: From the 2007 EFSA 104 it transpire
Page 43 and 44: 7.3 Project Objective 3:To safeguar
Page 45 and 46: 7.3.4 A Future Strategy for EVIs?Se
Page 47 and 48: 8 COORDINATION8.1 A Co-ordinated Re
Page 49 and 50: some extent also GoU through distri
Page 51 and 52: 9 RELIEF AND RECOVERY - CONNECTEDNE
Page 53 and 54: expected of them. From their perspe
Page 55 and 56: 9.4 Lessons Learnt♦♦♦♦♦St
Page 57 and 58: dependency among the IDPs and unwil
Page 59 and 60: establish the food security situati
Page 61 and 62: ANNEX 1: Terms of Reference for the
Page 63 and 64: • Desk studies. As a general back
Page 65 and 66: F. Time frame and budget considerat
Page 67 and 68: Annex 2: Evaluation Programme - inc
Page 69 and 70: Annex 3: List of Documents Consulte
Page 71 and 72: Expert OpinionsMr. Joe OloyaMr. Gra
Page 73: Typical Menu:BREAKFAST:• Millet p
show all

evaluation of general food distribution in northern uganda: gulu ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?