13.07.2015 Views

environmental assessment us border patrol, tucson sector

environmental assessment us border patrol, tucson sector

environmental assessment us border patrol, tucson sector

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2-3, continuedDouglas FOB EA DraftAug<strong>us</strong>t 2011AffectedEnvironmentUtilities andInfrastructureTransportationAesthetics and VisualResourcesHazardo<strong>us</strong> MaterialSocioeconomicsNo ActionAlternativeNo direct impacts wouldoccur.No direct impacts wouldoccur.No direct impacts wouldoccur.No hazardo<strong>us</strong> materialsimpacts would occur.No direct impacts wouldoccur.PreferredAlternativeMinor increase indemand on utilities withupgrade of the existingelectrical service.No direct impacts wouldoccur.Minor direct impacts onaesthetic and visualresources within thevicinity of the FOB.No known hazardo<strong>us</strong>wastes are located onthe site. Potential forminor adverse impactsduring constructionwould be minimizedwith BMPs. ASTs andmaintenance facilityhave the potential togenerate hazardo<strong>us</strong>waste impacts.Beneficial impacts dueto increasedenforcement along the<strong>border</strong> and short-termexpenditures on FOBconstruction.Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to the PreferredAlternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to the PreferredAlternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to the PreferredAlternative.Impacts would besimilar to the PreferredAlternative.Minimal newconstruction and grounddisturbance areanticipated at the siteand the currentstructures at the sitecannot be seen fromGeronimo Trail.Therefore, no impactswould occur.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.Impacts would besimilar to thosedescribed for thePreferred Alternative.2-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!