640(...continued)The fact is that no matter how we may choose to interpret this story–whetherliterally, or symbolically, or in terms of an out-dated, pre-scientific way of describing mentalillness–the fact remains that we are always involved in a mysteriously difficult matterwhenever we seek to describe the “interior life” of human beings, especially when we aredealing with unusual, bizarre behavior that defies our usual understanding.Whenever we try to describe the “inner beings” of persons, what is happening“within” others, and ourselves, we are attempting to speak of and describe that which isintangible, mysterious, and incapable of being described literally and exactly. Weacknowledge this, confessing by our language that we live in a world surrounded by themysterious, by the intangible, by realities far greater than the physical senses are able todescribe.The stories we tell, or the psychological models we use, to describe these realitiesare not to be taken exactly, and literally (for example, the “id,” the “ego,” and the “superego”),but they are certainly to be taken seriously. They point to the reality of theseunseen, mysterious beings or forces that are at work in our lives, that cause us to do whatwe do, whatever their exact nature.The ancient world chose to describe these unseen, mysterious realities in terms of“demons” or “unclean spirits.” Our modern world chooses to use descriptive terms thathave grown out of the study of depth psychology and mental illness. It is obvious that ourmodern understanding and descriptive language has changed markedly as various schoolsof psychology have held sway.But regardless of the inability to arrive at a uniform, exact descriptive language, thereality of these unseen, inner forces at work in human personality simply cannot besuccessfully denied.There is far more to a human being than just a physical body that is born, thatmoves through life, and then dies, to be no more. There is within every human being amysterious “spiritual reality” that defies description, but that is nonetheless known, andreal, and of far greater value than simply bones and flesh and hair. And all too often, thatmysterious “inner being” becomes divided and confused, and comes under the powerfulinfluence of “unclean forces” that are destructive of human personality. This fact cannot beavoided–and the biblical documents do not seek to avoid it, but confront it openly andfrankly.When these biblical documents (such as <strong>Mark</strong>) seek to describe this reality in termsof people being under the influence and control of “unclean spirits,” what are we tounderstand by this? Must we, in their light, forsake the modern view, with its psychologicallanguage and models, and return to that earlier, first-century view, in which the earth ispictured as being inhabited by spirits and demons, by good and evil “angels” fighting forthe possession of human hearts? If so, there is little chance that the biblical message isgoing to get a fair hearing in our modern world.406(continued...)
640(...continued)But even if we are unable to share in this ancient way of describing this mysteriousreality, the fact is that there are still many people in this modern world who have beenovercome by, and who live under the influence of, “unclean spirits.” They have lost controlof their “inner lives,” and they have come under the control of destructive, terribly harmfulforces. <strong>In</strong>stead of directing their lives to positive, pure, morally upbuilding goals, theymove relentlessly towards negative, immoral, destructive ends–towards ruin. They hurtthemselves and those around them. They throw away family fortunes, and even take theirown lives in dangerous pursuits and addictions.Their “inner being,” their “spirit,” however we may choose to describe it, instead ofbeing a governing force for good and truth and purity, and instead of being in control, haslost control, and has become the source of life-threatening destructive forces. Is this not afact of human experience in our modern world, one that is all too real in many a brokenfamily, and in every city and country of our modern world? How else can we explain whatwe today label “alcoholism” or “sexual perversion,” or “drug addiction,” or “criminalinsanity”? Do not all of these labels point to the experienced fact that something has gonewrong “inside” persons, that their “inner being” or “spirit” has gone terribly wrong, and hasbecome “twisted,” or “perverted”?<strong>In</strong> the first century, the authors of the Gospels such as <strong>Mark</strong>, deeply influenced bytheir surrounding culture and world-views, sought to describe such universal humanexperiences in terms of being “possessed,” as “having a demon,” or as being under thedominating influence of “an unclean spirit.” The first century Jewish world had come underthe powerful influence of Persian religion, with its “dualism,” its God of Light (“AhuraMazda”) and its God of Darkness (“Ahriman”), with an array of heavenly angels and hellishdemons. The Jewish people, including Jesus, and the writers of the New Testament, weredeeply influenced by that “dualistic” world-view as they described the reality of evil innerforces in human lives.But is the student of <strong>Mark</strong>, or the disciple of Jesus in the modern world, bound toaccept that ancient “world-view,” that first century manner of explanation and description?Is it not much better to realize the culturally conditioned nature of that first centurydescription, and admit that it is no longer appropriate in the light of our modern way ofunderstanding and explanation?We insist that even though <strong>Mark</strong>, and Jesus, may have used this way of describingthe destructive inner forces in human personality, it is also true that according to <strong>Mark</strong> 7:1-23, especially verses 14-23, Jesus taught that the origin of uncleanness in the human spiritis from within, not from without, and placed responsibility for spiritual uncleanness squarelyon the individual’s inner thoughts and desires.“And again having called the crowd together, he was saying to them, ‘All of you,listen to me and understand. There is nothing from outside the person, which entering intohim, can make him common [or unclean]. But rather, those things that come out of theperson are the things that make the person common [or, unclean].’ And when they hadentered into a house, (away) from the crowd, his followers were asking him (concerning)(continued...)407
- Page 1 and 2: NOT ONLY THE WIND AND THE WAVES-BUT
- Page 3 and 4: 632(...continued)like a farmer plan
- Page 5 and 6: 633 6345.1 And they came to the oth
- Page 7: 638(...continued)were haunted by de
- Page 11 and 12: Because he had many times been boun
- Page 13 and 14: 647 6485.6 And seeing the Jesus fro
- Page 15 and 16: 652you should not torment me.” 5.
- Page 17 and 18: 660 661 662and over that he should
- Page 19 and 20: 664(...continued)Leviticus 11:7 (th
- Page 21 and 22: 667the pigs, and the herd rushed do
- Page 23 and 24: 676“Legion”; and they were made
- Page 25 and 26: 684 685 686says to him: “Go to yo
- Page 27 and 28: 689 690proclaim in the Ten-City Are
- Page 29 and 30: 691(...continued)Petrine [that is,
- Page 31 and 32: 691(...continued)429
- Page 33 and 34: SIGNS OF THE COMING KINGDOM:SICKNES
- Page 35 and 36: 693 694 6955.21 And when the Jesus
- Page 37 and 38: 700 701 702 703 704[look-] one of t
- Page 39 and 40: 705(...continued)addiction, over wh
- Page 41 and 42: 713And a great crowd was following
- Page 43 and 44: 718 719under many physicians, and w
- Page 45 and 46: 718(...continued)Oepke shows how be
- Page 47 and 48: 724 7255.28 For she was saying that
- Page 49 and 50: 7335.30 And immediately the Jesus,
- Page 51 and 52: 743 744 7455.34 So then he said to
- Page 53 and 54: 749 7505.35 While he is still speak
- Page 55 and 56: 756 757afraid. Only believe!" 5.37
- Page 57 and 58: 763 764did not die, but is sleeping
- Page 59 and 60:
767mother, and those with him, and
- Page 61 and 62:
775 776 777[immediately] with great
- Page 63 and 64:
779(...continued)Anderson, however,
- Page 65:
PRAYERLord Jesus, we are learning f