13.07.2015 Views

Ulaanbaatar 2013

Ulaanbaatar 2013

Ulaanbaatar 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mongolia Compact Gender Summary Report: Best Practices And Lessons LearnedImage 6.1. Snapshot of EPRs which includes the gender boxThe project is currently assessing the National Land Information System (NLIS), which is expected tobe used widely in all land offices through a web based system. MCA-Mongolia has alreadyrecommended ALACGaC to have a sex-disaggregated data box in that electronic system in additionto the paper application we already made recommendations on, and the agency indicated it wouldadopt this.PRP also cooperated with the Mongolian Women‟s Federation (MWF) at the local and national levelin addressing issues of inequality and empowerment of women in land privatization processes.The PRP team participated and organized national and local forums and trainings for aimag and bagwomen jointly with MWF and local women‟s organizations and the health department. It has givenproject briefings and has organized activities addressing the promotion of female participation in theland privatization process. Land market specialists were trained on gender in Tuv, Orkhon, Khovd andKhentii aimags.An article on the project‟s efforts in increasing women‟s participation in the land privatization processwas published in Mongoljingoo, a monthly newspaper which is distributed free of charge to lowincomewomen and female headed households nationwide. PRP has worked with MWF on severalpublications on the project in the Mongoljingoo newspaper. TV programs to encourage femaleregistrations, women‟s involvement in property rights, and project‟s gender integration efforts weredeveloped in each regional center. Furthermore, gender trainings and meetings, in some cases incollaboration with women‟s NGOs, were conducted in each regional center. (PIU, report on PRPSocial aspect).According to sex-disaggregated data collected as of December 2012, from all 8 regional centers thathad been covered by then through the project, it was evident that 41% of all titles issued through PRPhad female holders (see figure below). In 2010, prior to the project‟s formalization activity, accordingto data collected by the PRP PIU in regional centers, 65% of land titles belonged to men, and 35% towomen. These figures on our project differ from those in the program‟s impact evaluation – theSpecial Hashaa Plot survey. This is because the data above include only those registering land throughour project, while the impact evaluation surveyed the broader public, including households thatreceived land titles with and without MCA assistance. This indicated that females held 31% of all land24Page 24 of 80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!