Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels
13.07.2015 • Views
Share Embed Flag

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
ePAPER READ
DOWNLOAD ePAPER
fachrunasahmad.files.wordpress.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

START NOW

22 RESEARCHING APPLIED LINGUISTICSHalpern‚ A. & Bower‚ G. (1982). Musical expertise <strong>and</strong> melodic structure in memory for musical notation.American Journal of Psychology‚ 95‚ 31-50.Hauslein‚ P. Good‚ R. & Cummins‚ C. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: From science student toscience teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(9)‚ 939-964.Hershey‚ D.‚ Walsh‚ D.‚ Read‚ S.‚ & Chulef‚ A. (1990). The effects of expertise on financial problem solving:Evidence for goal-directed‚ problem-solving scripts. Organizational Behavior <strong>and</strong> Human DecisionProcesses‚ 46‚ 77-101.Holt-Reynolds‚ D. (1999). Good readers‚ good teachers? Subject matter expertise as a challenge in learning toteach. Harvard <strong>Education</strong>al Review‚ 69(1)‚ 29-49.Hornberger‚ N. & Corson‚ D. (1999). Research Methods in <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (volume 8 of theEncyclopedia of <strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Education</strong>). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Horwitz‚ E. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning <strong>and</strong> teaching in the foreign languageMethods course. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals‚ 18‚ 333-340.Horwitz‚ E. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning <strong>and</strong> teaching in the foreign languagemethods course. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals‚ 18(4)‚ 333-340.Hosenfeld‚ C. (2003). Are some beliefs of second language learners ‘emergent’ phenomena? In P. Kalaja & A.M. Barcelos (Eds.)‚ New Approaches to Research on Beliefs about SLA. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Housner‚ L. & Griffey‚ D. (1985). <strong>Teacher</strong> cognition: Differences in planning <strong>and</strong> interactive decision makingbetween experienced <strong>and</strong> inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise <strong>and</strong> Sport‚ 56(1)‚ 45-53.Hughes-Wilhelm‚ K. (1997). Sometimes kicking <strong>and</strong> screaming: <strong>Language</strong> teachers-in-training react to acollaborative learning model. Modern <strong>Language</strong> Journal‚ 81‚ 527-542.Jacobs‚ J. & Morita‚ E. (2002). Japanese <strong>and</strong> American teachers’ evaluations of videotaped mathematicslessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics <strong>Education</strong>‚ 33(3)‚ 154-175.Johnson‚ K & Golombek‚ P. (2002). <strong>Teacher</strong>s’ Narrative Inquiry as Professional Development. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Johnson‚ K. (1992). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs <strong>and</strong> practices during literacy instruction fornon-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior‚ 24(1)‚ 83-108.Johnson‚ K. (1994). The emerging beliefs <strong>and</strong> instructional practices of preservice English as a Second<strong>Language</strong> teachers. Teaching & <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>‚ 10(4)‚ 439-452.Johnson‚ K. (1996). The vision vs. the reality: The tensions of the TESOL practicum. In D. Freeman & JRichards (Eds.)‚ <strong>Teacher</strong> Learning in <strong>Language</strong> Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Johnston‚ B. & Goettsch‚ K. (1999). In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations <strong>by</strong>experienced teachers. Canadian Modern <strong>Language</strong> Review. 56‚ 437-468.Johnston‚ M. (1994). Contrasts <strong>and</strong> similarities in case studies of teacher reflection <strong>and</strong> change. CurriculumInquiry‚ 24(1)‚ 9-26.Jones‚ M. & Vesilind‚ E. (1996). Putting practice into theory: Changes in the organization of preserviceteachers’ pedagogical knowledge. American <strong>Education</strong>al Research Journal‚ 33(1)‚ 91-117.Jones‚ M.‚ Carter‚ G. & Rua‚ M. (1999). Children’s concepts: Tools for transforming science teachers’knowledge. Science <strong>Education</strong>‚ 83(5)‚ 545-557.Jones‚ M.‚ Rua‚ M. & Carter‚ G. (1998). Science teachers’ conceptual growth within Vygotsky’s zone ofproximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching‚ 35(9)‚ 967-985.Kagan‚ D. & Tippins‚ D. (1991). How teachers’ classroom cases express their pedagogical beliefs. Journal of<strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>‚ 42(2)‚ 281 -291.Kagan‚ D. (1991). Laura <strong>and</strong> Jim <strong>and</strong> What They Taught Me about the Gap Between <strong>Education</strong>al Theory <strong>and</strong>Practice. Albany‚ NY: SUNY Press.Kagan‚ D. (1993). Contexts for the use of classroom cases. American <strong>Education</strong>al Research Journal‚ 30(4)‚703-723.Kalaja‚ P. & Barcelos‚ A. M. (2003). New Approaches to Research on Beliefs about SLA. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Kelchtermans‚ G. (1994). Biographical methods in the study of teachers’ professional development. In I.Carlgren‚ G. H<strong>and</strong>al‚ & S. Vaage (Eds.)‚ <strong>Teacher</strong>s’ Minds <strong>and</strong> Actions. London: Falmer.

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!