Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels
13.07.2015 • Views
Share Embed Flag

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
ePAPER READ
DOWNLOAD ePAPER
fachrunasahmad.files.wordpress.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

START NOW

BARTELS 23Kelly‚ G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.Kennedy‚ J. (1996). The role of teacher beliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes in teacher behaviour. In G. Tinker Sachs‚ M.Brock‚ & R. Lo (Eds.)‚ Directions in Second <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>. Hong Kong: City Universityof Hong Kong.Kennedy‚ M.‚ Ball‚ D. & McDiarmid‚ G. (1993). A Study Package for Examining <strong>and</strong> Tracking Changes in<strong>Teacher</strong>s’ Knowledge (Technical Series 93-1). East Lansing‚ MI: NCRTL.Kerekes‚ J. (2001). How can SLA theories <strong>and</strong> SLA researchers contribute to teachers’ practices? In B.Johnston & S. Irujo (Eds.)‚ Research <strong>and</strong> Practice in <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Education</strong>: Voices from the Field.Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on <strong>Language</strong> Acquisition.Kramsch‚ C. (1983). Culture <strong>and</strong> constructs: Communicating attitudes <strong>and</strong> values in the foreign languageclassroom. Foreign <strong>Language</strong> Annals 16(6)‚ 437-448.Lamb‚ M. (1995). The consequences of INSET. ELT Journal‚ 49(1)‚ 72-80.LeCouteur‚ A. & Delfabbro‚ P. (2001). Repertoires of teaching <strong>and</strong> learning: A comparision of universityteachers <strong>and</strong> students using Q methodology. Higher <strong>Education</strong>‚ 42‚ 205-235.Lederman‚ N. (1999). <strong>Teacher</strong>s’ underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the nature of science <strong>and</strong> classroom practice: Factors thatfacilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching‚ 36(8)‚ 916-929.Lehrer‚ R. & Franke‚ M. (1992). Applying personal construct psychology to the study of teachers’ knowledgeof fractions. Journal of Research in Mathematics <strong>Education</strong>‚ 23‚ 3‚ 223-241.Leinhardt‚ G. & Smith‚ D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of<strong>Education</strong>al Psychology‚ 77‚ 247-271.Leinhardt‚ G.‚ Weidman‚ C. & Hammond‚ K. (1987). Instruction <strong>and</strong> integration of classroom routines <strong>by</strong>expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry‚ 17(2)‚ 135-176.Lesgold‚ A. (1984). Acquiring Expertise. In John Anderson & Stephen Kosslyn (Eds.)‚ Tutorials in Learning<strong>and</strong> Memory. New York: Freeman.Levine‚ G. (2003). Student <strong>and</strong> instructor beliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes about target language use‚ first language use‚<strong>and</strong> anxiety: Report of a questionnaire study. Modern <strong>Language</strong> Journal‚ 87(3)‚ 343-364.Li‚ D. (1998). “It’s always more difficult than you plan <strong>and</strong> imagine”: <strong>Teacher</strong>s’ perceived difficulties inintroducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly‚ 32(4)‚ 677-703.Lightbown‚ P. & Spada‚ N. (1999). How <strong>Language</strong>s are Learned (Revised Edition). Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Llinares‚ S. (2000). Secondary school mathematics teacher’s professional knowledge: A case from the teachingthe concept of function. <strong>Teacher</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Teaching: Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice‚ 6(1)‚ 41 -62.Ma‚ B. & Luk‚ J. (1996). Instructive or destructive: Written instructions produced <strong>by</strong> ESL teacher trainees inHong Kong. In G. Tinker Sachs‚ M. Brock‚ & R. Lo (Eds.)‚ Directions in Second <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong><strong>Education</strong>. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.MacDonald‚ M.‚ Badger‚ R.‚ & White‚ G. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning<strong>and</strong> teaching? Teaching <strong>and</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>‚ 17(8)‚ 949-963.Macdonald‚ D. & Tinning‚ R. (1995). Physical educator education <strong>and</strong> the trend to proletarianization: A casestudy. Journal of Teaching in Physical <strong>Education</strong>‚ 15‚ 98-118.MacDonald‚ M.‚ Badger‚ R.‚ & White‚ G. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning<strong>and</strong> teaching? Teaching <strong>and</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>‚ 17(8)‚ 949-963.Markham‚ K.‚ Mintzes‚ J. & Jones‚ M. (1994). The concept map as research <strong>and</strong> evaluation tool – Furtherevidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching‚ 31(1)‚ 91-101.Maxwell‚ J. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thous<strong>and</strong> Oaks‚ CA: Sage.McAllister‚ G. & Irvine‚ J. (2002). The role of empathy in teaching culturally diverse students: A qualitativestudy of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong>‚ 53(4)‚ 433-443.McDonough‚ J. & McDonough‚ S. (1998). Research Methods for English <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong>s. London:Arnold.McDonough‚ J. (1994). A teacher looks at teachers’ diaries. ELT Journal‚ 48(1)‚ 57-65.McKeithen‚ K.‚ Reitman‚ J.‚ Rueter‚ H. & Hirtle‚ S. (1981). Knowledge organization <strong>and</strong> skill differences incomputer programmers. Cognitive Psychology‚ 13‚ 307-325.

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!