13.07.2015 Views

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education by Nat Bartels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 BULGARIAN MINI-LESSONS IN AN SLA COURSEteacher knowledge, that of content knowledge. However, most of the time students enterthese courses with certain well-established beliefs <strong>and</strong> attitudes about the concepts <strong>and</strong>processes of language learning. These beliefs play an important role in all aspects ofteaching as they seem to consciously or unconsciously inform one’s knowledge base.<strong>Teacher</strong> trainers in SLA have their own hypotheses about what their students shouldbe able to do as a result of taking a course. However, they do not always take as astarting point in their teaching the students’ current knowledge of language <strong>and</strong> languagelearning. One’s beliefs are usually a result of their current state of knowledge in a field.Most of the research on the role <strong>and</strong> importance of teacher beliefs <strong>and</strong> KAL in languageeducation focuses on teachers’ classroom behavior (Woods, 1996; Borg, 1998). Only afew studies examine the changes of teacher trainees’ KAL over the course of study in ateacher education program (Peacock, 2001; Brown <strong>and</strong> McGannon, 1998 <strong>and</strong> Breen,1991). The results from these studies indicate that studying pre-service <strong>and</strong> in-serviceteacher beliefs <strong>and</strong> knowledge base helps not only raise trainees’ awareness of theircurrent knowledge (Horwitz, 1985) but also target some incorrect beliefs <strong>and</strong> correctthem through both the teaching method <strong>and</strong> content of the training courses. Breen (1991)suggests that in order to achieve any changes in the trainees’ knowledge base,researchers need to promote teachers’ reflections <strong>and</strong> ask them to evaluate their beliefson the basis of “actual classroom events.” <strong>Bartels</strong> (2002) talks about the doublest<strong>and</strong>ards that seem to exist to date as “language teachers are expected to conductresearch on their practice.... but KAL teachers are not expected to the same” (p.74). Hesuggests that KAL teachers should investigate the effect of their own teaching throughdifferent methods using quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative data gathering <strong>and</strong> analysistechniques.There seems to be a need to look at the way teachers’ knowledge about language(KAL) changes as a result of particular applied linguistics instruction that offers themactual classroom experiences. One way to achieve this in a SLA class is through offeringteacher trainees language experience with lessons in a foreign language that they do notspeak. Thus through their personal experiences in the process of language learning <strong>and</strong>reflecting on this experience, trainees can better internalize the concepts of languageacquisition <strong>and</strong> later apply this knowledge in their future teaching practice.The purpose of this study was to examine the use of mini-lessons in a languagestudents did not speak as a pedagogical tool to demonstrate different language learningtheories, concepts, <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> thus facilitate learning about SLA.METHODOLOGYParticipantsThe study was conducted with students from an MA TESOL program at a mid-westernuniversity during the Fall semesters of 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2002. Thirty teacher trainees took partin the study – twenty six women <strong>and</strong> four men. The majority of the students were native

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!