13.07.2015 Views

Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...

Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...

Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Muslim Thought and Practice <strong>in</strong> Contemporary Indonesia 2 0 1and open discussion of issues connected with <strong>Islam</strong> and its role <strong>in</strong> Indonesians o c i e t y. Underly<strong>in</strong>g nearly every aspect of his thought is a sense of dynamismand ever-evolv<strong>in</strong>g adaptability of ultimate <strong>Islam</strong>ic ideals that is based upon anhistorically contextualized conceptualization of i j t i h a d . In this case, the technicallegal term “ i j t i h a d ” is best understood as mean<strong>in</strong>g a generalized effort toapprehend the appropriate application of <strong>Islam</strong>ic ideals to particular circumstances.In formulat<strong>in</strong>g vibrant and revitalized <strong>in</strong>terpretations of <strong>Islam</strong>, supportersof Indonesia’s emerg<strong>in</strong>g neomodernist movement developed a deepand nuanced appreciation of past-historical traditions of Muslim scholarshipand the variety of methods used by u l a m a throughout history to answer thechallenges of change.More traditionally tra<strong>in</strong>ed ulama <strong>in</strong> the period of the New Order tended tobelong to the NU. They also developed new models and adapted those of othersto suit their own vision and ideals. The NU is today the largest Muslim organization<strong>in</strong> Indonesia and possibly even <strong>in</strong> the entire world. Although its appealto the p e s a n t re n tradition of Muslim scholarship has been a ma<strong>in</strong>stay ofthe organization from its very <strong>in</strong>ception, s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1970s it has also developed<strong>in</strong> some very nontraditional ways. This change <strong>in</strong> character is due <strong>in</strong> part to its“modernized” organizational structure and <strong>in</strong> part to the <strong>in</strong>fluence of wellfundednongovernmental organizations, many of which have provided considerablef<strong>in</strong>ancial support for projects <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the NU dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decadesof Suharto’s New Order. It has thus opened itself up to allow some of its membersto experiment with ideas on the cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge of Muslim legal religiousand social thought <strong>in</strong> Indonesia.Throughout the struggle for <strong>in</strong>dependence and dur<strong>in</strong>g the first twentyyears of the Republic, the NU was a loyal supporter of Soekarno, despite hisovertures to socialists and communists. This pattern of cooperation was considerablyaltered, however, with the fall of Soekarno and the rise of the NewO r d e r. Throughout the 1970s, relations between the political w<strong>in</strong>g of the NUand the New Order government were visibly stra<strong>in</strong>ed over such issues as marriagelaw. However, after a period of protracted and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly bitter struggle,the organization formally accepted the state’s 1984 “mandate of monoloyalty”to P a n c a s i l a as the official ideology of the Indonesian state. P a n c a s i l a i sa five-part state doctr<strong>in</strong>e affirm<strong>in</strong>g ideals of social equality, opportunity, andjustice. Its first precept, “belief <strong>in</strong> one God,” had been objected to by somecommitted Muslims because of its <strong>Islam</strong>ically neutral formulation.In the mid-1980s, members of NU cast its new stance toward the governmentas a “return” to the orig<strong>in</strong>al design of the organization at the time of itsfound<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1926. NU’s relationship to the New Order government grew <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyfriendly dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1980s; a significant amount of new subsidieswere provided for p e s a n t re n education, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s. Some NU<strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>in</strong> turn, agreed to allow non-NU teachers to participate. Beyond

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!