104Bird, C.F.M. and D. Frankel. 1991. Problems in constructing a prehistoricregional sequence: Holocene south-east Australia. WorldArchaeology 23(2):179-192.Blundell, D. 2006. Revisiting cultural heritage in Sri Lanka: The Vedda(Vanniyaletto). Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 26:163–167. Accessed on 20 January 2012 from http://ejournal.anu.edu.au/index.php/bippa/article/view/21Cammiade, L. A. 1924. Pygmy Implements of the Lower Godavari. Man inIndia 4: 83-105.Clarkson, C., M. Petraglia, R. Korisettar, M. Haslam, N. Boivin, A.Crowther, P. Ditchfield, D. Fuller, P. Miracle, C. Harris, K.Connell, H. James, and J. Koshy. 2009. The oldest and longestenduring microlithic sequence in India: 35000 years of modernhuman occupation and change at the Jwalapuram Locality 9rockshelter. Antiquity 83(320): 326-348.Cohen, M.N. 1977. Food crisis in prehistory: over population and the origins ofagriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Conte, I. C. and F. G. Romero. 2008. Microwear Analysis of RetouchedGlass Fragments from Fortlet Miñana, Azul, Argentina, 1860–1863.International Journal of Historical Archaeology 12(3): 248-262.Cooper, Z. 1997. Prehistory of the Chitrakot Falls (Central India). Pune:Ravish Publishers.Cordaux, R., N. Saha, G.R. Bentley, R. Aunger, S.M. Sirajuddin, and M.Stoneking. 2003. Mitochondrial DNA analysis reveals diversehistories of tribal populations from India. European Journal ofHuman Genetics 11:253-264.Deraniyagala, S. U. 1988. The Prehistory of Sri Lanka: An EcologicalPerspective. Doctoral Dissertation, Anthropology Department,Harvard University (Ann Arbor University Microfilms., Int. No.8820579).Deraniyagala, S. U. 1992. The prehistory of Sri Lanka: An ecologicalperspective. Department of Archeological Survey, Government ofSri Lanka, (Part I).De Terra, H. and P. T. De Chardin. 1936. Observation on the UpperSiwalik Formation and Later Pleistocene Deposits in India. Proc.ofthe Amr. Phil.Soc. LXXXVI: 791-822. [Original reference not seen]De Terra, H. and T. T. Paterson. 1939. Studies on the Ice Age in India andRoy
Microlithic Sites of Mandla 105associated Human Cultures. Washington: Carnegie Institution ofWashington, Publication No.493.Dhavalikar, M. K. 1988. The first farmers of the Deccan. Pune: RavishPublishers.Dolitsky, A.B. 1985. A critical review of “the Mesolithic” in relation toSiberian Archaeology. Arctic 38(3): 178-187. Accessed on 20January 2012 from http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic38-3-178.pdfEdwin, D., H. Vishwanathan, S. Roy, M.V.Usha Rani, and P. P. Majumder.2002 Mitochondrial DNA diversity among five tribal population ofsouthern India. Current Science 83(2): 158-62. Accessed 20 January2012 from http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jul252002/158.pdfElwin, V. 1939. The Baiga. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House, 2002.Fairservis, W. A. 1971. The roots of ancient India. London: George Allen andUnwin Ltd.Foley, R. 1981. “Off-site Archaeology: An Alternative Approach for theShort-sited”, in: Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke.Edited by I. Hodder, G. Isaac and N. Hammond, pp.157-83.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Furer-Haimendorf, C. Von. 1948. Notes on the Stone Age in India. Man inIndia XXVIII, No.4.Gadgil, M, N.V. Joshi, U.V.Shambu Pradad, S. Manoharan, and S. Patil.1997. “Peopling of India,” in: The Indian Human Heritage. Edited byD. Balasubramanian and N. Appaji Rao. Hyderabad: UniversityPress.Ghosh, A. K. 1977. What happens when cultural and biologicaladaptability of man fails? A case study with Palaeolithic period inthe Garo Hills. In: Cultural and biological adaptability of man withspecial reference to northeast India. Dibrugarh University.Gordon, D.H. 1936. The Rock Paintings of the Mahadeo Hills. Indian Artsand Letters 10(1): 35-41.Gordon, D.H. 1950. The Stone Age of the Holocene in India and Pakistan.Ancient India 6:64-90.Haberle, S. G. and B. David. 2004. Climates of change: human dimensionsof Holocene environmental change in low latitudes of the PEPIItransect. Quaternary International 118-119(2004) 165-179. Accessed20 January 2012 from http://palaeoworks.anu.edu.au/pubs/
- Page 2 and 3:
Hukay is a Tagalog term that can ei
- Page 5 and 6:
ContentsiForeword1 Comets, Cults, a
- Page 7 and 8:
iForewordHukay Volume 17 contains f
- Page 9 and 10:
Comets, Cults, and Coins:A material
- Page 11 and 12:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 3the mater
- Page 13 and 14:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 5questioni
- Page 15 and 16:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 7historica
- Page 17 and 18:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 9authority
- Page 19 and 20:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 11arisen e
- Page 21 and 22:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 13This bea
- Page 23 and 24:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 15This clo
- Page 25 and 26:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 17Figure 6
- Page 27 and 28:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 19perspect
- Page 29:
Comets, Cults, and Coins 21Rochberg
- Page 32 and 33:
24Guiebexploratory visit to Batasan
- Page 34 and 35:
26looks into how certain claims to
- Page 36 and 37:
28Guieblocated off northwestern Boh
- Page 38 and 39:
30 Guieb(PAWB 2004). The NIPAS Act
- Page 40 and 41:
32 Guiebwho come to their reef. The
- Page 42 and 43:
34 GuiebSayer (1995) argues that it
- Page 44 and 45:
36Guiebrest in this site)’ was ho
- Page 46 and 47:
38 Guiebisland, which is also calle
- Page 48 and 49:
40 Guiebof their marine environment
- Page 50 and 51:
42 Guiebestablishment of an MPA on
- Page 52 and 53:
44 Guiebconservation. Village-encod
- Page 54 and 55:
46 Guiebharvest. Regardless of econ
- Page 56 and 57:
48 GuiebIn Batasan, sites with perm
- Page 58 and 59:
50 Guiebcorrals vulnerable to theft
- Page 60 and 61:
52 Guiebecology of marine conservat
- Page 62 and 63: 54 GuiebDios. 2006. Coastal Environ
- Page 64 and 65: 56 Guieb1918 manuscript. Manila: Th
- Page 66 and 67: 58 GuiebUmali, A. F. 1950. Guide to
- Page 69 and 70: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 71 and 72: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 73 and 74: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 75 and 76: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 77 and 78: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 79 and 80: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 81 and 82: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 83 and 84: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 85 and 86: Determination of Oriental Tradeware
- Page 87 and 88: Microlithic Sites of Mandla (Madhya
- Page 89 and 90: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 81compl
- Page 91 and 92: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 83Sites
- Page 93 and 94: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 85offer
- Page 95 and 96: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 87Figur
- Page 97 and 98: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 89Some
- Page 99 and 100: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 91group
- Page 101 and 102: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 93Figur
- Page 103 and 104: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 95admin
- Page 105 and 106: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 97Neoli
- Page 107 and 108: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 99Histo
- Page 109 and 110: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 101evol
- Page 111: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 103preh
- Page 115 and 116: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 107iws.
- Page 117: Microlithic Sites of Mandla 109www.
- Page 120 and 121: 112Eusebioacross Southeast Asia and
- Page 122 and 123: 114archaeologists do not publish in
- Page 124 and 125: 116different language family (Austr
- Page 126 and 127: 118Eusebiosubject is not even the f
- Page 128 and 129: 120Eusebiojournals, the topic gaine
- Page 130 and 131: 122Eusebio125:175-192.Dolukhanov, P
- Page 132 and 133: 124ParrenoSoares, P., J. A. Trejaut
- Page 134 and 135: 126made by the public. Quantifying
- Page 136 and 137: 128MelendresPhilippines, some are r
- Page 138 and 139: 130Manalochanges in the organisatio
- Page 140 and 141: 132Manalodefeat a giant, and marry
- Page 142 and 143: 134Santamariaborn,” and may refer
- Page 144 and 145: 136home, accompanied by bursts of f
- Page 146 and 147: 138Reyescognates of each other? Is
- Page 148 and 149: 140have used important Southeast As
- Page 150 and 151: 142ReferencesSteinberg, D. J. (ed.)
- Page 152 and 153: 144the law would protect a child ev
- Page 154 and 155: Wills, J. E. Jr. 2011. China and Ma