The-Eclipse-of-Islam-What-happend-to-Islam-after-Umar-by-G-A-Parwez-Tolue-Islam-Trust

The Elipse of Islam________________________________________________________are authentic. Presence of a tradition in a book does not mean that it isconsidered correct unless it is judged on the measure/standard of tradition.(p. 5)In my view, the “standard of Hadith” is that any hadith which goes againstthe teachings/commands of the Quran is not authentic. On the basis of thisargument, I dare say that whatever is written in the previous pages aboutthe beliefs and ideas which are attributed to the Imams is not correctlyattributed. They should be considered in accordance with the aboveremarks of Syed Zafar Hassan. These traditions should be considered asweak. However, Shias consider them authentic and I have no right to giveany judgment on them. Anyhow, I have to be careful because the Shias areblaming me of the heresy of the rejection of hadith.I am accused of the rejection of hadithIn the introduction of Ash Shafi (Vol. I) Allama Mohammad Hassan writes:“It is regrettable that among Muslims a group is alwayspresent which not only rejects the usefulness of hadith butsays:‘It is better that this meaningless literature is drowned inpure wine.’ (This is a useless literature which should bedestroyed.)The foundation of this fitna (mischief) was laid down duringthe last moments of the Prophet’s life when he asked for apen and ink and it was said that the Book of God wasenough. And those people were lashed during the Khilafat of______________________________________________________________What happened to Islam after Umar? [ 72 ]