06.12.2012 Views

Innovative Technology and Sustainable Development of Organic - 1.

Innovative Technology and Sustainable Development of Organic - 1.

Innovative Technology and Sustainable Development of Organic - 1.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Eutrophication, however, implies direct leaching <strong>of</strong> e.g. nitrate to the subsoil <strong>and</strong> water reserves, or<br />

run-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> phosphate to surface water, <strong>and</strong>, therefore, is a local problem. For environmental problems<br />

with a local aspect, environmental impact should be quantified per kg <strong>of</strong> product <strong>and</strong> per ha (Halberg et<br />

al., 2005). In our case we concentrated on N, as in organic production the phosphorous balance<br />

generally is close to zero (Hvid, 2008). The N-surplus per ha was 117 kg ha -1 in BAU, 116 kg ha -1 in<br />

ANW <strong>and</strong> 80 kg ha -1 in ENV. The difference in N-surplus could be explained by differences in<br />

stocking density among scenarios (see table 6, LSU per ha), as no manure was imported to or exported<br />

from the farm. In addition, Olesen et al. (2006) showed that a high N-surplus per ha was associated<br />

with a high GHG emissions per ha. In our study, we expressed emission <strong>of</strong> GHG emission per kg <strong>of</strong><br />

ECM, <strong>and</strong> we found no correlation between N-surplus per ha <strong>and</strong> emission <strong>of</strong> GHG per kg ECM<br />

In this scenario analysis we assumed no import or export <strong>of</strong> manure. In Denmark, the maximum N<br />

application from animal manure is 140 kg N per ha. Berntsen et al. (2004) showed that organic dairy<br />

farms in Denmark, on average, import 24 kg N ha -1 <strong>and</strong> export 14 kg N ha -1 in the form <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

manure. It will always be a possibility for intensive organic dairy farms to further intensify their<br />

enterprise by extending herd size <strong>and</strong> exporting manure from the farm, in order to produce more milk.<br />

However, they have to comply to the st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> grazing. To facilitate grazing, a Danish farm needs at<br />

least 0.2 ha <strong>of</strong> pasture per MPU. The different levels <strong>of</strong> excreted N per MPU, as result <strong>of</strong> varying<br />

production, complicate the estimation <strong>of</strong> allowable stocking density <strong>and</strong> calculations <strong>of</strong> obligatory<br />

manure export.<br />

Optimizing longevity <strong>of</strong> dairy cows can reduce GHG emissions per kg milk produced by 13%<br />

compared to an average culling rates <strong>of</strong> 35% (Weiske et al., 2006). Culling rate assumed in ANW <strong>and</strong><br />

ENV was lower than in the BAU scenario. The expected positive effect <strong>of</strong> an extended longevity on<br />

GHG emission per kg ECM in ANW was not achieved due to the lower annual milk production per<br />

cow, <strong>and</strong> the fact that bull calves are kept on the farm for three months <strong>and</strong> storage <strong>of</strong> manure in a deep<br />

pit.<br />

A fixed feed conversion rate was used to estimate feed requirements for a certain milk yield per<br />

cow. Feed conversion, however, depends on the level <strong>of</strong> feed intake. For each additional1000 SFU a<br />

cow eats per lactation, the feed conversion efficiency drops by 6.5% (Kristensen <strong>and</strong> Kjærgaard, 2004).<br />

This effect was not included in our computations, consequently production efficiency in BAU <strong>and</strong><br />

ANW were overestimated in by 6% <strong>and</strong> 2%, respectively.<br />

The total amount <strong>of</strong> fossil energy used was clearly highest in BAU where energy use is expressed<br />

per kg ECM, it was lowest in BAU <strong>and</strong> highest in ANW. Unlike high energy requirements for AMS<br />

use in BAU (Rasmussen <strong>and</strong> Pedersen, 2004), energy use per kg ECM was low because feed<br />

production on farm is low, whereas import <strong>of</strong> concentrates was high (BAU: 421 ton y -1 , ANW: 213.5<br />

ton y -1 ). Energy use for storage, drying <strong>and</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> purchased feed was not included in the<br />

analysis, resulting in an underestimation <strong>of</strong> energy use in ANW <strong>and</strong> especially in BAU. Energy use per<br />

kg ECM in ANW was high due to the low annual milk yield per cow. The relatively high use <strong>of</strong> fossil<br />

energy in ENV resulted mainly from the relatively high use <strong>of</strong> on-farm diesel to cultivate arable crops,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to cut <strong>and</strong> carry grass, instead <strong>of</strong> grazing (BAU; 1492 MJ ha -1 , ANW; 1195 MJ ha -1 , <strong>and</strong> ENV;<br />

1485 MJ ha -1 ).<br />

Compared to other estimations <strong>of</strong> energy use per kg ECM (Cederberg <strong>and</strong> Flysjö, 2004; Thomassen<br />

et al., 2008) the values calculated in this study were low. One explanation is that direct <strong>and</strong> indirect<br />

energy used to process feed ingredients were not included in our analysis. Another reason could be that<br />

in practice only very few farms use “raw” components as concentrates, whereas most buy st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

mixtures containing components such as soy beans <strong>and</strong> palm oil which have to be transported from far<br />

away.<br />

Thesis Frank W. Oudshoorn 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!