06.12.2012 Views

Innovative Technology and Sustainable Development of Organic - 1.

Innovative Technology and Sustainable Development of Organic - 1.

Innovative Technology and Sustainable Development of Organic - 1.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

include the purchase <strong>of</strong> heifers as compensation for the culled <strong>and</strong> deceased cows. This was expensive<br />

for the BAU scenario, but in ENV <strong>and</strong> ANW scenario costs for rearing young stock, i.e. feed, labour<br />

<strong>and</strong> capacity costs, were included (table 6). Financing costs were lowest in ENV because the herd was<br />

smaller.<br />

The estimation <strong>of</strong> net pr<strong>of</strong>it was lowest in ANW scenario, followed by BAU <strong>and</strong> ENV. Net pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

includes all labour expenses, resulting in a negative figure for BAU <strong>and</strong> ANW. In practice this implies<br />

that the payment per hour <strong>of</strong> work for the farmer will be lower than the one assumed in table 5.<br />

5.3.2 Environmental evaluation <strong>of</strong> scenarios<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the environmental evaluation <strong>of</strong> scenarios are presented in table 8. The environmental<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> scenarios quantified N-surplus, GHG emissions <strong>and</strong> energy consumption. The N-surplus<br />

was lowest in ENV, which resulted from the low N-input. This low N-input was due to the fact that<br />

ENV is self-sufficient with respect to feed. In all scenarios we assumed no import or export <strong>of</strong> manure.<br />

In BAU, however, manure import would have been impossible, as the limit <strong>of</strong> 140 kg <strong>of</strong> N ha -1 from<br />

manure from the home herd input was reached (Danish st<strong>and</strong>ard).<br />

Table 8. Greenhouse Gas emission, nitrogen (N) surplus <strong>and</strong> fossil energy use per year for three<br />

scenarios <strong>of</strong> organic dairy production in Denmark, i.e., business as usual (BAU), animal welfare<br />

(ANW) <strong>and</strong> environmental scenario (ENV).<br />

Farm N-balance<br />

BAU ANW ENV<br />

N-surplus (kg N ha -1 ) 117 116 80<br />

N-input 1) (kg N ha -1 ) 169 160 109<br />

N-output 2) (kg N ha -1 ) 51 44 30<br />

N-output / cow year (kg N cow -1 ) 141 127 132<br />

Greenhouse gas emissions<br />

Total (kg CO2-eq) 1,741,563 1,409,821 910,523<br />

Relative percentage (%) 100 81 52<br />

Expressed per kg ECM 3) (%) 100 107 96<br />

Expressed per MPU 4) (%)<br />

Relative percentage from Enteric Fermentation per<br />

100 88 87<br />

MPU (%) 100 92 106<br />

From external source (%) 42 26 9<br />

From energy use (%) 5 6 8<br />

Fossil energy consumption<br />

Total (MJ) 1,753,080 1,453,243 1,009,779<br />

Relative percentage (%) 100 83 69<br />

Expressed per kg ECM (%) 100 109 105<br />

1)<br />

N import comprises nitrogen in seed, N- fixation, concentrates <strong>and</strong> precipitation<br />

2)<br />

N export comprises nitrogen in milk <strong>and</strong> meat<br />

3)<br />

ECM = energy-corrected milk<br />

4)<br />

MPU = milk producing unit<br />

98 <strong>Sustainable</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> in <strong>Organic</strong> Dairy Farming

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!