Recommendations

102
Smith et al. 2005
ACC/AHA/SCAI Practice Guidelines
ACC - www.acc.org
AHA - www.americanheart.org
SCAI - www.scai.org
the BARI study. Balloon Angioplasty Revascularization
Investigation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1420-5.
294. Abizaid A, Costa MA, Centemero M, et al. Clinical and economic
impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous and surgical treatment
of multivessel coronary disease patients: insights from the
Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) trial.
Circulation 2001;104:533-8.
295. Sedlis SP, Morrison DA, Lorin JD, et al. Percutaneous coronary
intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic
patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes
with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWE-
SOME randomized trial and registry. J Am Coll Cardiol
2002;40:1555-66.
296. Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P. A comparison of angioplasty
with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary
artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. N Engl J
Med 1992;326:10-6.
297. Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second
Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2)
trial. RITA-2 trial participants. Lancet 1997;350:461-8.
298. Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Agressive lipid-lowering therapy
compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease.
Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N
Engl J Med 1999;341:70-6.
299. Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, et al. Seven-year outcome
in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical
therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1161-70.
300. Folland ED, Hartigan PM, Parisi AF. Percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for stable angina
pectoris: outcomes for patients with double-vessel versus singlevessel
coronary artery disease in a Veterans Affairs Cooperative
randomized trial. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. J Am
Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1505-11.
301. Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac
Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of
patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus
revascularization. Circulation 1997;95:2037-43.
302. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional
versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or
non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart
Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention
Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet 2002;360:743-51.
303. Dakik HA, Kleiman NS, Farmer JA, et al. Intensive medical therapy
versus coronary angioplasty for suppression of myocardial
ischemia in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective,
randomized pilot study. Circulation 1998;98:2017-23.
304. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery
disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre
study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in
Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet 1999;354:708-15.
305. Shaw RE, Anderson HV, Brindis RG, et al. Development of a risk
adjustment mortality model using the American College of
Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-
NCDR) experience: 1998-2000. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1104-
12.
306. Ellis SG, Weintraub W, Holmes D, Shaw R, Block PC, King SB,
III. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome
of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with
high interventional volumes. Circulation 1997;95:2479-84.
307. Moscucci M, Kline-Rogers E, Share D, et al. Simple bedside
additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous
coronary interventions. Circulation 2001;104:263-8.
308. Holmes DR, Selzer F, Johnston JM, et al. Modeling and risk prediction
in the current era of interventional cardiology: a report
from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic
Registry. Circulation 2003;107:1871-6.
309. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, et al. American College of
Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization
laboratory standards: a report of the American College of
Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2170-214.
310. Hirshfeld JW, Jr., Ellis SG, Faxon DP, et al. ACC clinical competence
statement: recommendations for the assessment and maintenance
of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures. J Am
Coll Cardiol 1998;31:722-43.
311. Pepine CJ, Babb JD, Brinker JA, et al. Guidelines for training in
adult cardiovascular medicine. Core Cardiology Training
Symposium (COCATS): Task Force 3: training in cardiac
catheterization and interventional cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol
1995;25:14-6.
312. Hirshfeld JWJ, Banas JSJ, Brundage BH, et al. American College
of Cardiology training statement on recommendations for the
structure of an optimal adult interventional cardiology training
program: a report of the American College of Cardiology task
force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol
1999;34:2141-7.
313. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a
report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and
Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll
Cardiol 1988;12:529-45.
314. Shook TL, Sun GW, Burstein S, Eisenhauer AC, Matthews RV.
Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume
operators. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:331-6.
315. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Laskey WK. The relationship between
coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications.
JAMA 1995;274:1137-42.
316. Jollis JG, Peterson ED, Nelson CL, et al. Relationship between
physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome
in elderly patients. Circulation 1997;95:2485-91.
317. Ho V. Evolution of the volume-outcome relation for hospitals performing
coronary angioplasty. Circulation 2000;101:1806-11.
318. Hamad N, Pichard AD, Lyle HR, Lindsay J, Jr. Results of percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty by multiple, relatively
low frequency operators: 1986-1987 experience. Am J Cardiol
1988;61:1229-31.
319. O’Neill WW, Brodie BR, Ivanhoe R, et al. Primary coronary
angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (the Primary
Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 1994;73:627–34.
319a.Hannan EL, Wu C, Wallford G, et al. Volume-outcome relationships
for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era.
Circulation 2005;112:1171-79.
320. Hannan EL, Kilburn HJ, Bernard H, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G,
Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship
between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling
for clinical risk factors. Med Care 1991;29:1094-107.
321. McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Dickens JD, et al. Relation between
operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous
coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent.
JAMA 2000;284:3139-44.
322. Ryan TJ. The critical question of procedure volume minimums