Recommendations
ACC/AHA/SCAI PCI Guidelines - British Cardiovascular Intervention ...
ACC/AHA/SCAI PCI Guidelines - British Cardiovascular Intervention ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104<br />
Smith et al. 2005<br />
ACC/AHA/SCAI Practice Guidelines<br />
ACC - www.acc.org<br />
AHA - www.americanheart.org<br />
SCAI - www.scai.org<br />
357. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute<br />
myocardial infarction: Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della<br />
Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet<br />
1986;1:397-402.<br />
358. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both,<br />
or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial<br />
infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct<br />
Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet 1988;2:349-60.<br />
359. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, et al. Prehospital-initiated<br />
vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy: the Myocardial<br />
Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA 1993;270:1211-6.<br />
360. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al. Role of cardiac surgery in<br />
the hospital phase management of patients treated with primary<br />
angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2000<br />
Jun 1 ;85(11):1292-6.<br />
361. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate<br />
angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial<br />
infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction<br />
Study Group [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1993;328:673-9.<br />
362. Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JH,<br />
Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty<br />
with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction<br />
[see comments]. N Engl J Med 1993;328:680-4.<br />
363. Gibbons RJ, Holmes DR, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Hopfenspirger<br />
MR, Gersh BJ. Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration<br />
of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment<br />
for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit<br />
and Catheterization Laboratory Groups. N Engl J Med 1993;328:<br />
685-91.<br />
364. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary<br />
coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for<br />
acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA<br />
1997;278:2093-8.<br />
365. Moosvi AR, Khaja F, Villanueva L, Gheorghiade M, Douthat L,<br />
Goldstein S. Early revascularization improves survival in cardiogenic<br />
shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll<br />
Cardiol 1992;19:907-14.<br />
366. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization<br />
in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.<br />
SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize<br />
Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med<br />
1999;341:625-34.<br />
367. Vogel JH. Changing trends for surgical standby in patients undergoing<br />
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J<br />
Cardiol 1992;69:25F-32F.<br />
368. Wharton TPJ, McNamara NS, Fedele FA, Jacobs MI, Gladstone<br />
AR, Funk EJ. Primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute<br />
myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals<br />
without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1257-65.<br />
369. Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS. Use of direct angioplasty for<br />
treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in hospitals<br />
with and without on-site cardiac surgery: the Myocardial<br />
Infarction, Triage, and Intervention Project Investigators.<br />
Circulation 1993;88:2067-75.<br />
370. Iannone LA, Anderson SM, Phillips SJ. Coronary angioplasty for<br />
acute myocardial infarction in a hospital without cardiac surgery.<br />
Tex Heart Inst J 1993;20:99-104.<br />
371. Brush JEJ, Thompson S, Ciuffo AA, et al. Retrospective<br />
Comparison of a Strategy of Primary Coronary Angioplasty versus<br />
Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial<br />
Infarction in a Community Hospital without Cardiac Surgical<br />
Backup. J Invasive Cardiol 1996;8:91-8.<br />
372. Smyth DW, Richards AM, Elliott JM. Direct Angioplasty for<br />
Myocardial Infarction: One-Year Experience in a Center with<br />
Surgical Back-up 220 Miles Away. J Invasive Cardiol<br />
1997;9:324-32.<br />
373. Weaver WD, Parsons LS, Every NR. Primary coronary angioplasty<br />
in hospitals with and without surgery backup. J Invas<br />
Cardiol 1995;7:34F-9F.<br />
374. Meier B. Surgical standby for percutaneous transluminal coronary<br />
angioplasty. In: Topol EJ, ed. Textbook of Interventional<br />
Cardiology. Phildelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1999:466-74.<br />
375. Wharton TP Jr, Grines LL, Turco MA, et al. Primary angioplasty<br />
in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site<br />
(the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for<br />
primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1943-50.<br />
376. Brodie BR. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention at hospitals<br />
without on-site cardiac surgery: expanding the use of mechanical<br />
reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll<br />
Cardiol 2004;43:1951-3.<br />
377. Vogel JH. Angioplasty in the patient with an evolving myocardial<br />
infarction: with and without surgical backup. Clin Cardiol<br />
1992;15:880-2.<br />
378. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, et al. A comparison of<br />
coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial<br />
infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:733-42.<br />
379. Lange RA, Hillis LD. Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty<br />
be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction?<br />
Thrombolysis—the preferred treatment. N Engl J Med<br />
1996;335:1311-2; discussion 1316-7.<br />
380. Aversano T, Aversano LT, Passamani E, et al. Thrombolytic therapy<br />
vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial<br />
infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site<br />
cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA<br />
2002;287:1943-51.<br />
381. Grines CL, Westerhausen DR Jr, Grines LL, et al. A randomized<br />
trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis<br />
in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air<br />
Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study. J Am Coll<br />
Cardiol 2002;39:1713-9.<br />
382. Caputo RP, Ho KK, Stoler RC, et al. Effect of continuous quality<br />
improvement analysis on the delivery of primary percutaneous<br />
transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.<br />
Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1159-64.<br />
383. Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines<br />
for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction:<br />
a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart<br />
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on<br />
Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol<br />
1999;34:890-911.<br />
384. Lotfi M, Mackie K, Dzavik V, Seidelin PH. Impact of delays to<br />
cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting. J Am Coll<br />
Cardiol 2004;43:337-42.<br />
385. Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation<br />
1976;54:522-3.<br />
386. Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of<br />
coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly<br />
assigned to treatment groups. Circulation 1983;68:951-60.<br />
387. Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized<br />
trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina: the Veterans<br />
Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative<br />
Study Group. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1333-9.<br />
388. Varnauskas E. Survival, myocardial infarction, and employment<br />
status in a prospective randomized study of coronary bypass sur-
Change language