06.09.2015 Views

Recommendations

ACC/AHA/SCAI PCI Guidelines - British Cardiovascular Intervention ...

ACC/AHA/SCAI PCI Guidelines - British Cardiovascular Intervention ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96<br />

Smith et al. 2005<br />

ACC/AHA/SCAI Practice Guidelines<br />

ACC - www.acc.org<br />

AHA - www.americanheart.org<br />

SCAI - www.scai.org<br />

coronary angioplasty: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.<br />

Circulation 1996;94:35-43.<br />

100. Currier JW, Faxon DP. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal<br />

coronary angioplasty: have we been aiming at the wrong target? J<br />

Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:516-20.<br />

101. Kuntz RE, Baim DS. Defining coronary restenosis: newer clinical<br />

and angiographic paradigms. Circulation 1993;88:1310-23.<br />

102. Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Baim DS. Generalized<br />

model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting<br />

and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:15-25.<br />

103. Blackshear JL, O’Callaghan WG, Califf RM. Medical approaches<br />

to prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll<br />

Cardiol 1987;9:834-48.<br />

104. Bresee SJ, Jacobs AK, Garber GR, et al. Prior restenosis predicts<br />

restenosis after coronary angioplasty of a new significant narrowing.<br />

Am J Cardiol 1991;68:1158-62.<br />

105. Hirshfeld JWJ, Schwartz JS, Jugo R, et al. Restenosis after coronary<br />

angioplasty: a multivariate statistical model to relate lesion<br />

and procedure variables to restenosis. The M-HEART<br />

Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:647-56.<br />

106. Al SJ, Berger PB, Holmes DR, Jr. Coronary artery stents. JAMA<br />

2000;284:1828-36.<br />

107. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty:<br />

one-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial. Benestent Study<br />

Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:255-61.<br />

108. Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Crea F, Chiariello L, Gioffre<br />

PA. A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for<br />

isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary<br />

artery. N Engl J Med 1997;336:817-22.<br />

109. George CJ, Baim DS, Brinker JA, et al. One-year follow-up of the<br />

Stent Restenosis (STRESS I) Study. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:860-5.<br />

110. Rodriguez A, Ayala F, Bernardi V, et al. Optimal coronary balloon<br />

angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent<br />

(OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results. J Am Coll<br />

Cardiol 1998;32:1351-7.<br />

111. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled<br />

trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of<br />

platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. The EPISTENT<br />

Investigators. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting.<br />

Lancet 1998;352:87-92.<br />

112. Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Moliterno DJ, et al. Complementary clinical<br />

benefits of coronary-artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein<br />

IIb/IIIa receptors. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition<br />

in Stenting Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:319-27.<br />

113. Betriu A, Masotti M, Serra A, et al. Randomized comparison of<br />

coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment<br />

of de novo coronary artery lesions (START): a four-year follow-up.<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1498-506.<br />

114. Weaver WD, Reisman MA, Griffin JJ, et al. Optimum percutaneous<br />

transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine<br />

stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial. Lancet<br />

2000;355:2199-203.<br />

115. Deleted in press. See Ref 658.<br />

116. Waksman R, White RL, Chan RC, et al. Intracoronary gammaradiation<br />

therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients<br />

with in-stent restenosis. Circulation 2000 May 9;101 (18 ):2165 -<br />

71 101:2165-71.<br />

117. Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. Catheter-based radiotherapy<br />

to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting. N Engl J Med<br />

1997;336:1697-703.<br />

118. Ellis SG, Roubin GS, King SB, III, et al. Angiographic and clinical<br />

predictors of acute closure after native vessel coronary angioplasty.<br />

Circulation 1988;77:372-9.<br />

119. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic<br />

and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty<br />

for multivessel coronary disease: implications for patient<br />

selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group.<br />

Circulation 1990;82:1193-202.<br />

120. Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD, McConahay DR, Johnson WL,<br />

Giorgi LV. “High-risk” percutaneous transluminal coronary<br />

angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:33G-7G.<br />

121. Gaul G, Hollman J, Simpfendorfer C, Franco I. Acute occlusion<br />

in multiple lesion coronary angioplasty: frequency and management.<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:283-8.<br />

122. Ellis SG, Roubin GS, King SB, III, et al. In-hospital cardiac mortality<br />

after acute closure after coronary angioplasty: analysis of<br />

risk factors from 8,207 procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:<br />

211-6.<br />

123. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a<br />

report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart<br />

Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and<br />

Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on<br />

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll<br />

Cardiol 1993;22:2033-54.<br />

124. de Feyter PJ, van den Brand M, Laarman GJ, et al. Acute coronary<br />

artery occlusion during and after percutaneous transluminal<br />

coronary angioplasty: frequency, prediction, clinical course,<br />

management, and follow-up [published erratum appears in<br />

Circulation 1991 Jul;84(1):446]. Circulation 1991;83:927-36.<br />

125. Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, et al. Lesion morphology and<br />

coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. J Am Coll<br />

Cardiol 1992;19:1641-52.<br />

126. Kastrati A, Schomig A, Elezi S, et al. Prognostic value of the<br />

modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association<br />

stenosis morphology classification for long-term angiographic<br />

and clinical outcome after coronary stent placement.<br />

Circulation 1999;100:1285-90.<br />

127. Budde T, Haude M, Hopp HW, et al. A prognostic computer<br />

model to individually predict post-procedural complications in<br />

interventional cardiology: the INTERVENT Project. Eur Heart J<br />

1999;20:354-63.<br />

128. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, et al. Incremental prognostic<br />

value of elevated baseline C-reactive protein among established<br />

markers of risk in percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation<br />

2001;104:992-7.<br />

129. Harrell L, Schunkert H, Palacios IF. Risk predictors in patients<br />

scheduled for percutaneous coronary revascularization. Catheter<br />

Cardiovasc Interv 1999;48:253-60.<br />

130. Singh M, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR, Jr., Bell MR, Rihal CS.<br />

Correlates of procedural complications and a simple integer risk<br />

score for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol<br />

2002;40:387-93.<br />

131. Zaacks SM, Allen JE, Calvin JE, et al. Value of the American<br />

College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stenosis morphology<br />

classification for coronary interventions in the late<br />

1990s. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:43-9.<br />

132. Krone RJ, Shaw RE, Klein LW, et al. Evaluation of the American<br />

College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the<br />

Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification<br />

system in the current “stent era” of coronary interventions<br />

(from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am<br />

J Cardiol 2003;92:389-94.<br />

133. Krone RJ, Laskey WK, Johnson C, et al. A simplified lesion classification<br />

for predicting success and complications of coronary<br />

angioplasty. Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac<br />

Angiography and Intervention. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:1179-84.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!