30.09.2015 Views

Parliamentary

Annual Report and Accounts 2011–2012 - Independent ...

Annual Report and Accounts 2011–2012 - Independent ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34<br />

Use of Resources<br />

The following table compares the Estimate with the outturn for resource and capital<br />

MPs Expenses<br />

Subhead A<br />

Estimate Outturn Underspend/<br />

Overspend<br />

£’000 £’000 £’000<br />

MPs’ salary 49,198 48,386 812<br />

MPs’ staff salary and pensions 74,750 67,132 7,618<br />

MPs’ expenses (capped) (1) 28,137 18,781 9,356<br />

MPs’ expenses (uncapped) (1) 12,649 5,557 7,092<br />

Winding up 0 91 (91)<br />

Subtotal 164,734 139,947 24,787<br />

IPSA Operating costs<br />

Subhead B (2)<br />

IPSA Staff 3,576 3,330 246<br />

Non Staff Costs (3) 1,953 1,644 309<br />

Non Cash 835 944 (109)<br />

Subtotal 6,364 5,918 446<br />

Subhead C<br />

Unallocated Provision 0 0 0<br />

Subtotal 0 0 0<br />

Subhead D<br />

Provisions and Impairments 1,000 46 954<br />

Subtotal 1,000 46 954<br />

Total Resources Estimate 172,098 145,911 26,187<br />

Capital 2,602 435 2,167<br />

Total Estimate 174,700 146,346 28,354<br />

(1) MPs’ expenses are divided into capped budgets (principally accommodation, staffing and office-based<br />

costs) and uncapped budgets (travel and subsistence). A detailed breakdown is shown in Note 7 to the<br />

accounts.<br />

(2) IPSA’s operating costs are in Subhead B on the Estimate which includes the Compliance Staff cost.<br />

Non-staff costs are set out in detail in Note 9 of the accounts.<br />

(3) IPSA drew down the unallocated provision of £16.572m in January 2012.<br />

(4) IPSA has a new Subhead D for provisions and impairments which carry over the year end. This year the<br />

provision was used for early departure costs.<br />

On resource, capital and cash the actual requirement was less than that requested. The main cause of this<br />

outcome was that the Estimate was based on the assumption that MPs would claim the maximum possible<br />

under the new Scheme.<br />

IPSA Annual Report and Accounts 2011-2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!