08.10.2015 Views

BULLETIN

CSQ-Bulletin93

CSQ-Bulletin93

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 57 | Bulletin 93 | September 2015<br />

AsWeWere<br />

by Dr David Zuck, History of Anaesthesia Society<br />

... we have seen more of war in these few weeks than has fallen to the lot of many an old campaigner. It was our great regret<br />

that we had so little time in which to see the work of the Antwerp hospitals. Those we saw were magnificent buildings,<br />

equipped in a way which filled us with envy. The show part was the suite of operating theatres, which certainly eclipsed those<br />

of the London Hospital. Each theatre had its own anaesthetizing room, its own surgeon’s room, and its own sterilizing rooms<br />

and stores, all furnished with a lavishness beyond the financial capacity of any hospital in London.<br />

Our own hospital occupied one of the largest houses in the Boulevard Leopold, a magnificent avenue. It had previously been<br />

used as a school, and was well adapted to our needs. We had in all 150 beds, and a staff of about 50, including 8 doctors and<br />

20 nurses. When a rush came the scenes in any part of the hospital required steady nerves, but the centre of interest was the<br />

theatre. Here all the worst cases were brought - men with ghastly injuries from which the most hardened might turn away in<br />

horror. With all these we had to deal as rapidly and completely as possible, reducing each case to a form which it would be<br />

practicable to nurse, where the patient would be free from unnecessary pain, and where he would have the greatest chance<br />

of ultimate recovery. Of course all this was done under anaesthesia. What a field hospital must have been before the days of<br />

anaesthesia is too horrible to contemplate.<br />

It is not so many years since a famous surgeon who was fond of walking back from his work at the London Hospital along the<br />

Whitechapel Road used to be pointed to with horror by the Whitechapel butchers. But now all that is changed. The surgeon<br />

can be human again, and except when he goes round his wards his patients may never know of his existence. They go to<br />

sleep in a quiet ante-room, and they waken up in the ward. Of the operation and its difficulties they know no more than their<br />

friends at home. Perhaps even more wonderful is the newer method of spinal anaesthesia, which we used for the difficult<br />

abdominal cases. With the injection of a minute quantity of fluid into the spine all sensation disappears up to the level of<br />

the arms. It is rather uncanny at first to see a patient smoking a cigarette and reading the paper whilst on the other side of<br />

a screen a big operation is in progress. But for many cases this method is unsuitable, and without chloroform we should<br />

indeed have been at a loss. The Belgians are an abstemious race, and they took it beautifully. I am afraid they were a striking<br />

contrast to their brothers on this side of the water, who were fond of demonstrating that chloroform does not mix well with<br />

alcohol in the human body.<br />

With surgery on rather bold lines it was extraordinary how much could be done, especially in the way of saving limbs. During<br />

the whole of our stay in Antwerp we never once had to resort to an amputation, although anything more awkward to manage<br />

than a thigh with six inches of bone missing is difficult to imagine. Splints presented insuperable difficulties, so after some<br />

hesitation we attempted the method of fixation by means of steel plates introduced by Sir Arbuthnot Lane. The missing<br />

piece of bone is replaced by a long steel plate screwed to the remaining portions. The result was a brilliant success. Not only<br />

could the limb be handled as if there were no fracture at all, to the infinite comfort of the patient, but the wounds themselves<br />

cleared up with great rapidity. There were none of the prophesied disasters, sepsis, or breakages, and one of our most<br />

indignant critics returned to his own hospital after a visit, with his pockets full of plates.<br />

It is one of my chief regrets that we never kept a visitors book. Twice a week the Queen of the Belgians came round our<br />

wards. She came quite simply, with one of her ladies, and no one could have taken a deeper interest in the patients. One<br />

of our distinguished and most welcome visitors was Madame Curie, the discoverer of radium. She brought her large X-ray<br />

equipment, and stayed with us for a week. One of our store rooms was rapidly fitted up as an impromptu radiographic<br />

department, and electric current was obtained from a dynamo bolted to the step of a car standing in the courtyard, and<br />

driven by a belt from the flywheel of the engine. Madame Curie was an indefatigable worker, and in a very short time had<br />

taken radiographs of all the cases we placed at her disposal, Considering its obvious utility it has always been a source of<br />

wonder to me that there is no such thing as a car designed with a view to radiology. It would place X-ray equipment at the<br />

disposal of every cottage hospital.<br />

And this brings me to a subject on which I feel very strongly, the folly of removing bullets. If a bullet is doing any harm,<br />

interfering with a joint, or in any way causing pain or inconvenience, by all means let it be removed. But the mere presence<br />

of a bullet inside the body will of itself do no harm at all. We now know that, provided they are clean, we can introduce steel<br />

plates, silver wire, silver nets, into the body without causing any trouble, and a bullet is no worse than any of these. It is a<br />

matter in which the public is largely to blame, for they consider that unless the bullet is removed the surgeon has not done<br />

his job. It may be the mark of a Scottish ancestry, but if I ever get a bullet in my own anatomy, I shall keep it.<br />

*****<br />

Extracted from H.S. Souttar, A Surgeon in Belgium. London, Arnold, 1915. (Reprinted by The Naval and Military Press<br />

Ltd.) This wonderfully interesting book is also available to e-readers as a free download from the web site of the Gutenberg<br />

Project. Sir Henry Souttar (1875-1964), was a mechanic, a mathematician, and a surgeon. On 16 May 1925 at the<br />

London Hospital he performed the first open heart operation, in an attempt to dilate what was thought to be a stenosed<br />

mitral valve. He had an illustrious career, and according to Plarr’s Lives was instrumental in founding the Faculty of<br />

Anaesthetists, of which he was elected an honorary fellow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!