13.10.2015 Views

AUDIT ANALYTICS AUDIT

1JWn3ix

1JWn3ix

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CASE STUDY B: IMPLEMENTING CONTINUOUS <strong>AUDIT</strong>ING AND CONTINUOUSMONITORING<br />

has actually been processed as promised. Exceptions are passed to<br />

Human Resources for further review.<br />

The CMR also examines cases where exceptions have been closed<br />

as "no leave owing," but leave is processed nonetheless (as a test of<br />

integrity).<br />

The CMR produces weekly activity and status summaries for<br />

executive management.<br />

The leave CMR is complex. We argue that it tests the boundaries of<br />

CA/CM and thus provides an illustration of developments in an<br />

environment with multiple data sources and a complex software and<br />

data ecosystem. Specifically, the CMR:<br />

accesses several systems to assemble and cross match the data;<br />

applies relatively complex algorithms to reduce the number of<br />

false positives; and<br />

uses multiple platforms to deliver and monitor the exceptions<br />

including ensuring that the exceptions are being actioned as<br />

advised.<br />

The value of CA/CM is diluted unless there is a robust mechanism to<br />

track and resolve exceptions. Further, the value of CA/CM is also<br />

reduced if the algorithms do not effectively address the suppression of<br />

false positives. Experience suggests that external auditors tend to find<br />

techniques of this sort to be uneconomical due to the need to incorporate<br />

the business rules of differing clients in the algorithms. For example,<br />

tools such as ACL can easily check for potential duplicate invoicing;<br />

however, ACL will potentially produce large numbers of potential<br />

exceptions unless scripts are developed to, for example, identify<br />

matching reversals. The experience at Metcash has been that multiple<br />

iterations of the algorithms are required to minimise false positives.<br />

Moving Forward—Key Risk Indicators<br />

Metcash has moved away from the AS/NZS ISO 31000 Risk Management<br />

Standard risk profiling approach, as published by the International<br />

Standards Organization. A static 5 × 5 matrix that builds on likelihood<br />

and consequences is not consistently of practical use to management.<br />

Monitoring and assessing key risks through data driven risk indicators<br />

provides a greater benefit to management. The increasing availability of<br />

data and sophisticated analytics has facilitated a more accurate<br />

identification of problems in critical areas such as Food Safety and<br />

Human Resources. The use of dashboards (see figure B-2 for example)<br />

has enabled the risk indicator data to be effectively communicated to<br />

management via various media including tablet devices.<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!