07.12.2012 Views

Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate. Regions of ...

Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate. Regions of ...

Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate. Regions of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The U.S. <strong>Climate</strong> Change Science Program Chapter 2<br />

Figure 2.7 Area <strong>of</strong> drought <strong>in</strong> the western United States as reconstructed from<br />

tree r<strong>in</strong>gs (Cook et al., 2004).<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the clearest<br />

trends <strong>in</strong> the U.S.<br />

observational record<br />

is an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />

precipitation events.<br />

46<br />

episodes <strong>of</strong> extremely high temperatures. The<br />

month <strong>of</strong> July 1936 <strong>in</strong> the central United States<br />

is a notable example. To illustrate, L<strong>in</strong>coln, NE<br />

received only 0.05” <strong>of</strong> precipitation that month<br />

(after receiv<strong>in</strong>g less than 1 <strong>in</strong>ch the previous<br />

month) while experienc<strong>in</strong>g temperatures reach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or exceed<strong>in</strong>g 110°F on 10 days, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

117°F on July 24. Although no studies <strong>of</strong> trends<br />

<strong>in</strong> such “compound” extreme events have been<br />

performed, they represent a significant societal<br />

risk.<br />

2.2.2.2 shOrt dur atiOn heav y<br />

PreCiPitatiOn<br />

2.2.2.2.1 Data Considerations <strong>and</strong> Terms<br />

Intense precipitation <strong>of</strong>ten exhibits higher<br />

geographic variability than many other extreme<br />

phenomena. This poses challenges for the analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> observed data s<strong>in</strong>ce the heaviest area <strong>of</strong><br />

precipitation <strong>in</strong> many events may fall between<br />

stations. This adds uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty to estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

regional trends based on the climate network.<br />

The uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty issue is explicitly addressed <strong>in</strong><br />

some recent studies.<br />

Precipitation extremes are typically def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

based on the frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence (by<br />

percentile [e.g., upper 5%, 1%, 0.1%, etc.] or<br />

by return period [e.g., an average occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

once every 5 years, once every 20 years, etc.]),<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or their absolute values (e.g., above 50 mm,<br />

100 mm, 150 mm, or more). Values <strong>of</strong> percentile<br />

or return period thresholds vary considerably<br />

across North America. For example, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

United States, regional average values <strong>of</strong> the<br />

99.9 percentile threshold for daily precipitation<br />

are lowest <strong>in</strong> the Northwest <strong>and</strong> Southwest<br />

(average <strong>of</strong> 55 mm) <strong>and</strong> highest <strong>in</strong> the South<br />

(average <strong>of</strong> 130mm) 19 .<br />

As noted above, spatial patterns <strong>of</strong> precipitation<br />

have smaller spatial correlation scales (for<br />

example, compared to temperature <strong>and</strong> atmospheric<br />

pressure) which means that a denser<br />

network is required <strong>in</strong> order to achieve a given<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty level. While monthly precipitation<br />

time series for flat terra<strong>in</strong> have typical radii<br />

<strong>of</strong> correlation 20 (ρ) <strong>of</strong> approximately 300 km<br />

or even more, daily precipitation may have<br />

ρ less than 100 km with typical values for<br />

convective ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> isolated thunderstorms<br />

<strong>of</strong> approximately 15 to 30 km (G<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Kagan, 1976). Values <strong>of</strong> ρ can be very small<br />

for extreme ra<strong>in</strong>fall events, <strong>and</strong> sparse networks<br />

may not be adequate to detect a desired m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> change that can result <strong>in</strong><br />

societally-important impacts <strong>and</strong> can <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

important changes <strong>in</strong> the climate system.<br />

2.2.2.2.2 United States<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the clearest trends <strong>in</strong> the United States<br />

observational record is an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> heavy precipitation events (Karl<br />

<strong>and</strong> Knight, 1998; Groisman et al., 1999, 2001,<br />

2004, 2005; Kunkel et al., 1999b; Easterl<strong>in</strong>g et<br />

al., 2000; IPCC, 2001; Semenov <strong>and</strong> Bengtsson,<br />

2002; Kunkel, 2003). One measure <strong>of</strong> this<br />

is how much <strong>of</strong> the annual precipitation at a<br />

location comes from days with precipitation<br />

exceed<strong>in</strong>g 50.8 mm (2 <strong>in</strong>ches) (Karl <strong>and</strong> Knight,<br />

1998). The area <strong>of</strong> the United States affected<br />

by a much above normal contribution from<br />

these heavy precipitation days <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />

a statistically significant amount, from about<br />

9% <strong>in</strong> the 1910s to about 11% <strong>in</strong> the 1980s <strong>and</strong><br />

1990s (Karl <strong>and</strong> Knight, 1998). Total precipitation<br />

also <strong>in</strong>creased dur<strong>in</strong>g this time, due <strong>in</strong><br />

large part to <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />

precipitation events (Karl <strong>and</strong> Knight, 1998). In<br />

19 The large magnitude <strong>of</strong> these differences is a major<br />

motivation for the use <strong>of</strong> regionally-vary<strong>in</strong>g thresholds<br />

based on percentiles.<br />

20 Spatial correlation decay with distance, r, for many<br />

meteorological variables, X, can be approximated by<br />

an exponential function <strong>of</strong> distance: Corr (X(A), X(B))<br />

~ e - r/ρ where r is a distance between po<strong>in</strong>t A <strong>and</strong> B <strong>and</strong><br />

ρ is a radius <strong>of</strong> correlation, which is a distance where<br />

the correlation between the po<strong>in</strong>ts is reduced to 1/e<br />

compared to an <strong>in</strong>itial “zero” distance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!