You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
al relationship to their condition<br />
of deportability) as a patriarchal<br />
erotic fantasy, border porn refracts<br />
the state’s desire for migrant bodies<br />
through the lens of sexualized<br />
domination. Media is never neutral;<br />
it necessarily frames events<br />
in a manner that demands to be<br />
viewed and perceived a certain way.<br />
Though the obscene of inclusion<br />
is placed potentially in view, the<br />
visual techniques that porn deploys<br />
construct a certain gaze within the<br />
viewing subject, here a heteropatriarchal<br />
perspective. As embodied<br />
images that have particular capacity<br />
to reach, so to speak, into the<br />
physiology of the viewer through<br />
the induction of excitation-frustration<br />
cycles, porn is powerfully<br />
interpellative, doing the work of<br />
gazing for the viewer and positioning<br />
them in a given relation with<br />
the subjects onscreen. Border porn,<br />
despite momentarily revealing<br />
the structure of coercion behind<br />
the images, ultimately dissimulates<br />
this coercion by identifying<br />
the viewer with the state. The migrants’<br />
“desirability” is avowed, but<br />
any threads of solidarity between<br />
viewer and subject that might unsettle<br />
the conditions of desire are<br />
obscured by the scopophilic fixation<br />
on sexual subjection. The deportation<br />
regime is in plain sight,<br />
but only as a cipher.<br />
An analysis of how the videos<br />
make use of actors’ bodies will<br />
aid in deciphering the entangled<br />
and encoded discourses that they<br />
index. Border porn first seeks to<br />
establish a recognizable scene of<br />
exclusion. The border agents are<br />
invariably dressed in green fatigues<br />
and bulletproof vests. They are<br />
carrying sidearms, emphasizing<br />
both the ostensible danger they<br />
face and their mastery over the<br />
situation at hand. In nearly every<br />
video, the agents wear dark aviator<br />
sunglasses, which they never<br />
remove for any reason. By hiding<br />
their eyes and facial expressions,<br />
these sunglasses impose a one-way<br />
exchange of information, transposing<br />
the panoptic gaze of the state<br />
apparatus onto the actors’ bodies,<br />
which, along with the tactical uniforms<br />
and equipment, establishes<br />
them as an appendage of state<br />
power.<br />
The migrant women are typically<br />
found just walking down a<br />
dusty desert road or encamped behind<br />
a bush. Their motives for migrating<br />
are rarely referenced. They<br />
are imaged as ahistorical ambulating<br />
bodies, spontaneously sprouting<br />
from the landscape itself and<br />
disembedded from any prior conditions<br />
that might prefigure their<br />
decision to migrate. Their being is<br />
further truncated by the frequent<br />
use of the sole term “border-hopper”<br />
to name them in the video titles.<br />
As soon as the women are ap-<br />
37