09.11.2015 Views

Tester

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

al relationship to their condition<br />

of deportability) as a patriarchal<br />

erotic fantasy, border porn refracts<br />

the state’s desire for migrant bodies<br />

through the lens of sexualized<br />

domination. Media is never neutral;<br />

it necessarily frames events<br />

in a manner that demands to be<br />

viewed and perceived a certain way.<br />

Though the obscene of inclusion<br />

is placed potentially in view, the<br />

visual techniques that porn deploys<br />

construct a certain gaze within the<br />

viewing subject, here a heteropatriarchal<br />

perspective. As embodied<br />

images that have particular capacity<br />

to reach, so to speak, into the<br />

physiology of the viewer through<br />

the induction of excitation-frustration<br />

cycles, porn is powerfully<br />

interpellative, doing the work of<br />

gazing for the viewer and positioning<br />

them in a given relation with<br />

the subjects onscreen. Border porn,<br />

despite momentarily revealing<br />

the structure of coercion behind<br />

the images, ultimately dissimulates<br />

this coercion by identifying<br />

the viewer with the state. The migrants’<br />

“desirability” is avowed, but<br />

any threads of solidarity between<br />

viewer and subject that might unsettle<br />

the conditions of desire are<br />

obscured by the scopophilic fixation<br />

on sexual subjection. The deportation<br />

regime is in plain sight,<br />

but only as a cipher.<br />

An analysis of how the videos<br />

make use of actors’ bodies will<br />

aid in deciphering the entangled<br />

and encoded discourses that they<br />

index. Border porn first seeks to<br />

establish a recognizable scene of<br />

exclusion. The border agents are<br />

invariably dressed in green fatigues<br />

and bulletproof vests. They are<br />

carrying sidearms, emphasizing<br />

both the ostensible danger they<br />

face and their mastery over the<br />

situation at hand. In nearly every<br />

video, the agents wear dark aviator<br />

sunglasses, which they never<br />

remove for any reason. By hiding<br />

their eyes and facial expressions,<br />

these sunglasses impose a one-way<br />

exchange of information, transposing<br />

the panoptic gaze of the state<br />

apparatus onto the actors’ bodies,<br />

which, along with the tactical uniforms<br />

and equipment, establishes<br />

them as an appendage of state<br />

power.<br />

The migrant women are typically<br />

found just walking down a<br />

dusty desert road or encamped behind<br />

a bush. Their motives for migrating<br />

are rarely referenced. They<br />

are imaged as ahistorical ambulating<br />

bodies, spontaneously sprouting<br />

from the landscape itself and<br />

disembedded from any prior conditions<br />

that might prefigure their<br />

decision to migrate. Their being is<br />

further truncated by the frequent<br />

use of the sole term “border-hopper”<br />

to name them in the video titles.<br />

As soon as the women are ap-<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!