25.11.2015 Views

Retiring Trident

retiring-trident

retiring-trident

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Retiring</strong> <strong>Trident</strong><br />

22 See, e.g., “Russia makes latest high-risk move to keep pieces of its ‘near abroad’ in check”, Peter<br />

Beaumont, The Observer, London, 2 March 2014.<br />

23 CentreForum does not accept that ISIL is a state, and therefore abjures their favoured nomenclature<br />

of “Islamic State”.<br />

24 See, e.g., “Promoting Effective Competition in UK Defence Procurement: The Case of UK Maritime<br />

Patrol - Interim Report”, Toby Fenwick, CentreForum, London, July 2014.<br />

25 See “Nuclear Diplomacy and the Special Relationship: Britain’s Deterrent and America 1957 –<br />

1962”, Ian Clark, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994, pages 77 – 93.<br />

26 The first American warhead design passed to the UK was the W-28, which was anglicized as RED<br />

SNOW, and was first used in the YELLOW SUN Mark 2 thermonuclear free-fall weapon. See “Nuclear<br />

Diplomacy and the Special Relationship”, page 92.<br />

27 “Message to the Congress -- Amendment Between the United States and the United Kingdom of<br />

Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, White House Press Office, Washington DC, 24 July 2014.<br />

28 See “Amendment to the 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement (on nuclear weapons’ cooperation)”<br />

British American Security Information Council (BASIC), June 2004.<br />

29 NPT Article I states that, “Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer<br />

to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over<br />

such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage,<br />

or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons<br />

or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.” As both<br />

the UK and the US are recognised by the NPT as nuclear-weapons states, the NPT’s additional<br />

limitations on design and manufacturing assistance to non-nuclear-weapon states do not apply to<br />

the MDA, allowing the transfer of non-nuclear components of nuclear weapons.<br />

30 “Budget 2014”, Table D4: Total Managed Expenditure, page 109.<br />

31 CentreForum analysis of HM Treasury Budget 2014.<br />

32 “The Financial Context for the 2015 SDSR: The End of UK Exceptionalism?”, Malcolm Chalmers,<br />

RUSI, London, September 2014.<br />

33 “The Financial Context for the 2015 SDSR”, page 4.<br />

34 “The Financial Context for the 2015 SDSR”, page 6.<br />

35 Public Sector Gross Investment (PSGI) rises from £37.4bn in 2014-15 to £39.1bn in 2019-20. “Budget<br />

2014”, Table D4: Total Managed Expenditure, page 109.<br />

36 “Dropping the Bomb”, pages 48 – 49. 2032 assumes that there will be four SSBNs procured and<br />

“late 2020s” covers the Liberal Democrat position of two or three SSBNs being procured. Notably,<br />

as most of the cost in the early years is for design and engineering, the limited construction savings<br />

from procuring less than four SSBNs accrue at the end of the programme.<br />

37 Formally, the <strong>Trident</strong> II D5 Life Extension (LE) missile will serve until 2042. However, <strong>Trident</strong> II D5LE<br />

Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM) are expected to serve beyond 2050.<br />

38 Sir Nick Harvey MP, speaking in the <strong>Trident</strong> Debate of 20 January 2015. See HC Deb 20 Jan 2015,<br />

column 119.<br />

39 “After years of military cuts, can Britain still defend itself?”, Con Coughlin, Daily Telegraph, 2 February<br />

2015.<br />

40 “Television: From Burkina Faso with rockets to Upper Volta without”, Steve Crashaw, Independent,<br />

15 November 1998.<br />

41 Transcribed from image of the “National Policy Forum”. Any errors are solely the author’s responsibility.<br />

42 Transcribed from image of the “National Policy Forum”. Any errors are solely the author’s responsibility.<br />

43 “Ed Miliband hints he may back replacing <strong>Trident</strong> with cheaper system”, Matthew Holehouse, Daily<br />

Telegraph, London, 5 January 2015.<br />

44 The number of SSBNs the Liberal Democrats are proposing to procure remains unclear at the time<br />

of writing.<br />

45 See “Lib Dem activists back calls for fewer <strong>Trident</strong> submarines”, BBC News, 17 September 2013.<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!