Retiring Trident
retiring-trident
retiring-trident
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Retiring</strong> <strong>Trident</strong><br />
22 See, e.g., “Russia makes latest high-risk move to keep pieces of its ‘near abroad’ in check”, Peter<br />
Beaumont, The Observer, London, 2 March 2014.<br />
23 CentreForum does not accept that ISIL is a state, and therefore abjures their favoured nomenclature<br />
of “Islamic State”.<br />
24 See, e.g., “Promoting Effective Competition in UK Defence Procurement: The Case of UK Maritime<br />
Patrol - Interim Report”, Toby Fenwick, CentreForum, London, July 2014.<br />
25 See “Nuclear Diplomacy and the Special Relationship: Britain’s Deterrent and America 1957 –<br />
1962”, Ian Clark, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994, pages 77 – 93.<br />
26 The first American warhead design passed to the UK was the W-28, which was anglicized as RED<br />
SNOW, and was first used in the YELLOW SUN Mark 2 thermonuclear free-fall weapon. See “Nuclear<br />
Diplomacy and the Special Relationship”, page 92.<br />
27 “Message to the Congress -- Amendment Between the United States and the United Kingdom of<br />
Great Britain and Northern Ireland”, White House Press Office, Washington DC, 24 July 2014.<br />
28 See “Amendment to the 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement (on nuclear weapons’ cooperation)”<br />
British American Security Information Council (BASIC), June 2004.<br />
29 NPT Article I states that, “Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer<br />
to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over<br />
such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage,<br />
or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons<br />
or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.” As both<br />
the UK and the US are recognised by the NPT as nuclear-weapons states, the NPT’s additional<br />
limitations on design and manufacturing assistance to non-nuclear-weapon states do not apply to<br />
the MDA, allowing the transfer of non-nuclear components of nuclear weapons.<br />
30 “Budget 2014”, Table D4: Total Managed Expenditure, page 109.<br />
31 CentreForum analysis of HM Treasury Budget 2014.<br />
32 “The Financial Context for the 2015 SDSR: The End of UK Exceptionalism?”, Malcolm Chalmers,<br />
RUSI, London, September 2014.<br />
33 “The Financial Context for the 2015 SDSR”, page 4.<br />
34 “The Financial Context for the 2015 SDSR”, page 6.<br />
35 Public Sector Gross Investment (PSGI) rises from £37.4bn in 2014-15 to £39.1bn in 2019-20. “Budget<br />
2014”, Table D4: Total Managed Expenditure, page 109.<br />
36 “Dropping the Bomb”, pages 48 – 49. 2032 assumes that there will be four SSBNs procured and<br />
“late 2020s” covers the Liberal Democrat position of two or three SSBNs being procured. Notably,<br />
as most of the cost in the early years is for design and engineering, the limited construction savings<br />
from procuring less than four SSBNs accrue at the end of the programme.<br />
37 Formally, the <strong>Trident</strong> II D5 Life Extension (LE) missile will serve until 2042. However, <strong>Trident</strong> II D5LE<br />
Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM) are expected to serve beyond 2050.<br />
38 Sir Nick Harvey MP, speaking in the <strong>Trident</strong> Debate of 20 January 2015. See HC Deb 20 Jan 2015,<br />
column 119.<br />
39 “After years of military cuts, can Britain still defend itself?”, Con Coughlin, Daily Telegraph, 2 February<br />
2015.<br />
40 “Television: From Burkina Faso with rockets to Upper Volta without”, Steve Crashaw, Independent,<br />
15 November 1998.<br />
41 Transcribed from image of the “National Policy Forum”. Any errors are solely the author’s responsibility.<br />
42 Transcribed from image of the “National Policy Forum”. Any errors are solely the author’s responsibility.<br />
43 “Ed Miliband hints he may back replacing <strong>Trident</strong> with cheaper system”, Matthew Holehouse, Daily<br />
Telegraph, London, 5 January 2015.<br />
44 The number of SSBNs the Liberal Democrats are proposing to procure remains unclear at the time<br />
of writing.<br />
45 See “Lib Dem activists back calls for fewer <strong>Trident</strong> submarines”, BBC News, 17 September 2013.<br />
90