25.11.2015 Views

Retiring Trident

retiring-trident

retiring-trident

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Retiring</strong> <strong>Trident</strong><br />

92 “Unacceptable Damage”, page 8.<br />

93 Countervalue strategy holds at risk those targets a potential adversary values, and is the essence of<br />

deterrence. By contrast, counterforce is the attempt to achieve a “disarming first strike” against a<br />

potential adversary’s nuclear forces, robbing them of the ability to launch a devastating counter-attack<br />

As such, it is closely associated with the notion of fighting – and winning – a nuclear war. See<br />

“Living with Nuclear Weapons”, Harvard Nuclear Study Group, Harvard University Press, Cambridge<br />

MA, 1983, page 92. The Harvard Nuclear Study Group consisted of Albert Carmesale, Paul Doty,<br />

Stanley Hoffman, Samuel P. Huntington, Joseph S. Nye, Jr. and Scott D. Sagan<br />

94 Cited in “Unacceptable Damage”, page 18, a 1976 draft minute to the Defence Secretary expressed<br />

the criterion as ““we must be certain of being able to inflict unacceptable damage on Moscow as<br />

the seat of the highly centralised Soviet Government system”, In December 1959, it was estimated<br />

that Moscow required four 1 Mt warheads to achieve destruction of 50 per cent of the buildings<br />

in metropolitan area. See “Nuclear Diplomacy and the Special Relationship”. See e.g., “Why the<br />

<strong>Trident</strong> debate is (largely) one about symbolism”, Mark Urban, Newsnight, BBC, 21 April 2010.<br />

95 Now Baron Owen of the City of Plymouth CH PC FRCP MB BChir.<br />

96 “Unacceptable Damage”, page 13.<br />

97 “Unacceptable Damage”, page 15.<br />

98 Duff Group Option 1. See “Unacceptable Damage”, page 16.<br />

99 Duff Group Option 2. See “Unacceptable Damage”, page 16.<br />

100 Duff Group Option 3a 10 Soviet cities; Option 3b 30 single-warhead targets. See “Unacceptable<br />

Damage”, page 16.<br />

101 “Unacceptable Damage”, page 23.<br />

102 “Unacceptable Damage”, page 22.<br />

103 “Unacceptable Damage”, pages 26 – 27.<br />

104 “Unacceptable Damage”, page 31.<br />

105 Conventional buildings are normally destroyed by a 5-psi overpressure wave, which generates a<br />

wind of 163 mph, stronger than all but the severest tropical storms and tornadoes. It was estimated<br />

that ICBM bunkers may require up to 10,000 psi of overpressure in order to guarantee their<br />

destruction. See “Overpressure”, atomicarchive.com, accessed 29 January 2015.<br />

106 “From Polaris to <strong>Trident</strong>”, pages 147 – 151.<br />

107 Counterforce is a nuclear strategy that emerged from SAC in the Eisenhower Administration as part<br />

of their 1954/55 “New Look”. Counterforce is a first-strike doctrine under which one side attempts<br />

to destroy an opponent’s ability to strike back by destroying all (or almost all) of their nuclear capability,<br />

and in the process to provide the opportunity to win a nuclear war. Even after the emergence<br />

of highly survivable second-strike forces (notably SBLMs on SSBNs), counterforce continued to enjoy<br />

some support as it avoided the massive destruction of an all-out attack on an adversary’s cities<br />

(so called countervalue targets). Counterforce was renamed “damage limitation” under the Reagan<br />

Administration, reportedly because “counterforce” sounded “too aggressive”. See “Command and<br />

Control”, Eric Schlosser, The Penguin Press, New York, 2013, pages 131, 133, and 434.<br />

108 The smallest of the US ICBM counterforce ICBM warheads is the W-78 carried by the LGM-30G<br />

Minuteman III with a yield of 335 – 350kt. See “The W-78 Warhead: Intermediate Yield Strategic<br />

ICBM MIRV Warhead”, FAS.org, retrieved 28 January 2015.<br />

109 The W53 carried by the LGM-25C Titan II ICBMs produced a 9Mt yield, and was in service from<br />

1962 to 1987. See “Command and Control”, Eric Schlosser, The Penguin Press, New York, 2013,<br />

page 3.<br />

110 MX (Missile eXperimental) was the development programme for what became the LGM-118<br />

Peacekeeper, a solid-fueled ICBM capable of carrying up to 12 W87 300kt warheads 5200nm with a<br />

CEP of 90 meters. LGM-118 entered USAF service in 1986 at F. E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming,<br />

in modified LGM-30 Minuteman silos, and was retired in 2005. See “LGM-118 PEACEKEEPER”,<br />

MissileThreat.com, accessed 31 January 2015.<br />

111 Polaris A3 in USN service carried a W58 warhead with a nominal yield of 200kt; the RN initially<br />

used the ET.317 warhead (a UK W58 / W59 hybrid warhead) of 200kt nominal yield, before moving<br />

a 225kt variant in the Chevaline warhead. Poseidon C3 used W68 warheads with a nominal yield<br />

of 40kt. <strong>Trident</strong> I C4 used the W76 warhead of 100kt nominal yield, which is the basis for the UK<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!