Popular Photography - February 2015 USA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
0.36 0.38<br />
0.42 0.44<br />
TEST RESULTS<br />
IMAGE QUALITY ISO 100–1600<br />
above our cutoff of 2500 lines for<br />
an Excellent rating. At ISO 800,<br />
resolution remained strong with<br />
2625 lines. At ISO 3200, it finally<br />
fell just below the threshold for<br />
our top honors, with 2490 lines.<br />
As sensitivity rises, noise and<br />
the effects of noise reduction<br />
technology—which we apply at<br />
default settings using the RAW<br />
conversion software that ships<br />
with the camera—conspire to<br />
reduce resolution. The 7D Mark<br />
II hit 2100 lines at ISO 12,800 and<br />
2000 lines at its top standard<br />
sensitivity of ISO 16,000. In its<br />
expanded ISO range, resolution<br />
dropped to 1950 lines at ISO 25,600<br />
and 1800 lines at ISO 51,200.<br />
This pattern shows in our noise<br />
tests, in which the 7D Mark II won<br />
our best rating of Extremely Low<br />
at ISO 100 and 200. It stepped to<br />
Very Low at ISO 400, then to Low<br />
at ISO 800 and 1600. From there<br />
noise builds steadily, scoring<br />
Moderately Low at ISO 3200 and<br />
climbing through Unacceptable<br />
range at ISO 6400 and above.<br />
Compared with Canon’s original<br />
7D, the new model produced<br />
cleaner shots at all shared ISOs<br />
save ISO 6400 but reached an<br />
Unacceptable noise rating one<br />
stop earlier. Looking closer,<br />
though, the cameras straddle our<br />
cutoff of 3.0 for this rating: The 7D<br />
scored a 2.8 at ISO 6400, while the<br />
7D Mark II turned in a 3.2. Sony’s<br />
A77 II can’t match this Canon’s<br />
noise control at lower ISOs, but<br />
beats it at ISO 800 and higher.<br />
The 7D Mark II proved cleaner<br />
than both the Nikon D300s and<br />
the Pentax K-3 at all shared ISOs.<br />
Jumping to a 65-point AF<br />
system from 19 points, the 7D<br />
Mark II showed consistent if<br />
modest improvement in speed.<br />
The best increases occurred in<br />
brighter light, mostly between<br />
EV 10 and EV 4. The camera<br />
barely breached the 1 second<br />
mark at the very dim level of EV<br />
–1 and showed above average<br />
consistency at EV –2.<br />
This may be due to higher<br />
sensitivity: the new AF system<br />
is rated to work in the neardarkness<br />
of EV –3. This surpasses<br />
the meter we use in our tests,<br />
which stops at EV –2, but when<br />
we dimmed the lights further, we<br />
were impressed that the 7D Mark<br />
II still focused reliably.<br />
In the Field<br />
While the 7D Mark II’s increase<br />
in focusing speed might seem<br />
nominal, the real benefit of the<br />
new AF system hits home once<br />
you take it out shooting. Its 65<br />
points cover a significantly larger<br />
portion of the frame than the 7D’s<br />
While some<br />
people<br />
might want<br />
to quibble<br />
over the 7D<br />
Mark II’s<br />
imaging<br />
test results,<br />
there’s no<br />
denying that<br />
Canon’s vast<br />
system of<br />
lenses and<br />
accessories<br />
is one of the<br />
best you can<br />
find.<br />
POOR<br />
EXCELLENT<br />
EXCELLENT<br />
RESOLUTION ISO 100<br />
1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000<br />
POOR<br />
2660<br />
COLOR ACCURACY<br />
HIGH<br />
NOISE<br />
UNACCEPTABLE<br />
EXCELLENT<br />
EXCELLENT 7.5<br />
HIGHLIGHT/SHADOW DETAIL<br />
LOW<br />
EXTREMELY LOW 0.8<br />
EXTREMELY LOW 1.0<br />
VERY LOW 1.3<br />
LOW 1.6<br />
LOW 1.8<br />
MODERATELY LOW 2.3<br />
UNACCEPTABLE 3.2<br />
UNACCEPTABLE 3.5<br />
UNACCEPTABLE 3.9<br />
UNACCEPTABLE 4.8<br />
UNACCEPTABLE 6.5<br />
EXTREMELY HIGH<br />
EXCELLENT<br />
EXCELLENT<br />
AT ISO<br />
100<br />
200<br />
400<br />
800<br />
1600<br />
3200<br />
6400<br />
12,800<br />
16,000<br />
25,600<br />
51,200<br />
3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5<br />
EXTREMELY LOW<br />
EXTREMELY HIGH<br />
CONTRAST<br />
HIGH<br />
LOW<br />
EXTREMELY HIGH<br />
AF SPEED<br />
0.51<br />
0.59<br />
0.68<br />
0.84<br />
1.02<br />
1.19<br />
SHOWN WITHOUT LENS