Popular Photography - February 2015 USA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tamron’s 16–300mm f/3.5–6.3 and<br />
18–270mm f/3.5–6.3, all stabilized,<br />
as well as the non-stabilized Pentax<br />
18–270mm f/3.5–6.3) dropped even<br />
more, into Average SQF territory,<br />
at the farthest reaches of their<br />
telephoto ranges.<br />
In our distortion tests using DxO<br />
Analyzer 5.3, we found Visible<br />
barrel distortion at 18mm (0.50%)<br />
and Visible or Slight pincushion<br />
distortion at 35mm (0.32%), 100mm<br />
(0.24%), and 300mm (0.15%). Even<br />
better was the Imperceptible barrel<br />
distortion within the macro range<br />
(0.06%). These numbers slightly<br />
trumped the competition’s.<br />
Perhaps the Sigma’s most<br />
impressive feat was its ability to<br />
suppress darkness around the image<br />
edges. The 18mm zoom setting<br />
showed edge falloff to f/4, but the<br />
other three tested focal lengths<br />
showed no detectable vignetting,<br />
even at maximum aperture in either<br />
normal or macro focusing ranges.<br />
This matched or surpassed that<br />
of its competitors, particularly the<br />
Pentax, which registered light falloff<br />
at the edges to f/8 or f/9 at three out<br />
of four tested focal lengths.<br />
Our panel of three testers gained<br />
an average of 3.33 stops when<br />
handholding at 300mm with OS<br />
enabled. In Macro mode, the average<br />
improvement was 2.6 stops.<br />
The lens’s subject magnification<br />
in Macro mode tested better than<br />
Sigma’s published specs. It ranged<br />
from 1:10.03 at 18mm to 1:2.45 at<br />
300mm rather than the published<br />
1:3. Not enough magnifying power?<br />
You can get to 1:2 with Sigma’s $55<br />
supplementary close-up lens (model<br />
AML72-01) made for this zoom.<br />
By almost all metrics, this new<br />
Sigma 18–300mm equaled Tamron’s<br />
16–300mm. While the latter offers a<br />
broader zoom range, the Sigma hit<br />
slightly higher SQF scores through<br />
the range and has a slightly better<br />
build. At deadline, the Sigma<br />
streeted for about $50 less. Tough<br />
choice!<br />
—Julia Silber<br />
18<br />
MM<br />
35<br />
MM<br />
100<br />
MM<br />
300<br />
MM<br />
SPECIFICATIONS<br />
18–300MM (18.76–293.05mm tested),<br />
f/3.5–6.3 (f/3.44–n.a. tested*), 17 elements in<br />
13 groups. Focus ring turns 80 degrees. Zoom<br />
ring turns 80 degrees. Focal length marked at<br />
18-, 28-, 35-, 50-, 80-, 135-, 200-, and 300mm.<br />
DIAGONAL VIEW ANGLE:<br />
76.5–5.4 degrees<br />
WEIGHT: 1.3 lbs FILTER SIZE: 72mm<br />
MOUNTS: Canon AF, Nikon AF, Pentax AF,<br />
Sigma AF, Sony AF<br />
INCLUDED: Lenshood<br />
STREET PRICE: $579<br />
WEBSITE: sigmaphoto.com<br />
TEST RESULTS<br />
DISTORTION: At 18mm, 0.50% (Visible)<br />
barrel; at 35mm, 0.32% (Visible) pincushion;<br />
at 100mm, 0.24% (Slight) pincushion;<br />
at 300mm, 0.15% (Slight) pincushion<br />
MACRO DISTORTION: At 300mm, 0.06%<br />
(Imperceptible) barrel<br />
LIGHT FALLOFF: At 18mm, gone by f/4;<br />
at 35mm, none; at 100mm, none;<br />
at 300mm, none<br />
MACRO LIGHT<br />
FALLOFF: At 300mm, none<br />
CLOSE-FOCUSING<br />
DISTANCE: 12.15 inches<br />
MAXIMUM MAGNIFICATION RATIO:<br />
At 18mm, 1:10.03; at 35mm, 1:6.94; at<br />
100mm, 1:2.83; at 300mm, 1:2.45<br />
IMAGE STABILIZATION: 3.33 stops<br />
MACRO STABILIZATION: 2.6 stops<br />
POPPHOTO.COM POPULAR PHOTOGRAPHY 75<br />
*TESTED MEASUREMENT NOT AVAILABLE DUE TO INSTRUMENT LIMITATIONS.<br />
REFLECT.<br />
DIFFUSE.<br />
CREATE.<br />
sunbounce@hasselbladbron.com