08.01.2016 Views

Popular Photography - February 2015 USA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tamron’s 16–300mm f/3.5–6.3 and<br />

18–270mm f/3.5–6.3, all stabilized,<br />

as well as the non-stabilized Pentax<br />

18–270mm f/3.5–6.3) dropped even<br />

more, into Average SQF territory,<br />

at the farthest reaches of their<br />

telephoto ranges.<br />

In our distortion tests using DxO<br />

Analyzer 5.3, we found Visible<br />

barrel distortion at 18mm (0.50%)<br />

and Visible or Slight pincushion<br />

distortion at 35mm (0.32%), 100mm<br />

(0.24%), and 300mm (0.15%). Even<br />

better was the Imperceptible barrel<br />

distortion within the macro range<br />

(0.06%). These numbers slightly<br />

trumped the competition’s.<br />

Perhaps the Sigma’s most<br />

impressive feat was its ability to<br />

suppress darkness around the image<br />

edges. The 18mm zoom setting<br />

showed edge falloff to f/4, but the<br />

other three tested focal lengths<br />

showed no detectable vignetting,<br />

even at maximum aperture in either<br />

normal or macro focusing ranges.<br />

This matched or surpassed that<br />

of its competitors, particularly the<br />

Pentax, which registered light falloff<br />

at the edges to f/8 or f/9 at three out<br />

of four tested focal lengths.<br />

Our panel of three testers gained<br />

an average of 3.33 stops when<br />

handholding at 300mm with OS<br />

enabled. In Macro mode, the average<br />

improvement was 2.6 stops.<br />

The lens’s subject magnification<br />

in Macro mode tested better than<br />

Sigma’s published specs. It ranged<br />

from 1:10.03 at 18mm to 1:2.45 at<br />

300mm rather than the published<br />

1:3. Not enough magnifying power?<br />

You can get to 1:2 with Sigma’s $55<br />

supplementary close-up lens (model<br />

AML72-01) made for this zoom.<br />

By almost all metrics, this new<br />

Sigma 18–300mm equaled Tamron’s<br />

16–300mm. While the latter offers a<br />

broader zoom range, the Sigma hit<br />

slightly higher SQF scores through<br />

the range and has a slightly better<br />

build. At deadline, the Sigma<br />

streeted for about $50 less. Tough<br />

choice!<br />

—Julia Silber<br />

18<br />

MM<br />

35<br />

MM<br />

100<br />

MM<br />

300<br />

MM<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

18–300MM (18.76–293.05mm tested),<br />

f/3.5–6.3 (f/3.44–n.a. tested*), 17 elements in<br />

13 groups. Focus ring turns 80 degrees. Zoom<br />

ring turns 80 degrees. Focal length marked at<br />

18-, 28-, 35-, 50-, 80-, 135-, 200-, and 300mm.<br />

DIAGONAL VIEW ANGLE:<br />

76.5–5.4 degrees<br />

WEIGHT: 1.3 lbs FILTER SIZE: 72mm<br />

MOUNTS: Canon AF, Nikon AF, Pentax AF,<br />

Sigma AF, Sony AF<br />

INCLUDED: Lenshood<br />

STREET PRICE: $579<br />

WEBSITE: sigmaphoto.com<br />

TEST RESULTS<br />

DISTORTION: At 18mm, 0.50% (Visible)<br />

barrel; at 35mm, 0.32% (Visible) pincushion;<br />

at 100mm, 0.24% (Slight) pincushion;<br />

at 300mm, 0.15% (Slight) pincushion<br />

MACRO DISTORTION: At 300mm, 0.06%<br />

(Imperceptible) barrel<br />

LIGHT FALLOFF: At 18mm, gone by f/4;<br />

at 35mm, none; at 100mm, none;<br />

at 300mm, none<br />

MACRO LIGHT<br />

FALLOFF: At 300mm, none<br />

CLOSE-FOCUSING<br />

DISTANCE: 12.15 inches<br />

MAXIMUM MAGNIFICATION RATIO:<br />

At 18mm, 1:10.03; at 35mm, 1:6.94; at<br />

100mm, 1:2.83; at 300mm, 1:2.45<br />

IMAGE STABILIZATION: 3.33 stops<br />

MACRO STABILIZATION: 2.6 stops<br />

POPPHOTO.COM POPULAR PHOTOGRAPHY 75<br />

*TESTED MEASUREMENT NOT AVAILABLE DUE TO INSTRUMENT LIMITATIONS.<br />

REFLECT.<br />

DIFFUSE.<br />

CREATE.<br />

sunbounce@hasselbladbron.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!