21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

2429870

2429870

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.21 – 6.24), in general terms I do not regard ‘negative’ evidence on this type of<br />

vehicle to be of any significance one way or the other.<br />

6.72 On their arrival in the terminal building that morning, Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun were<br />

stopped and questioned by a policeman named Detective Constable (DC) Scott, who<br />

gave oral evidence at the <strong>Inquiry</strong>.<br />

6.73 DC Scott explained that he did not have any prior intelligence relating to either<br />

Mr Lugovoy or Mr Kovtun. He stopped them simply because he thought they might be<br />

of interest. 47 DC Scott’s file contained a photograph of the two men taken when they<br />

were stopped, timed at 11.34am. 48<br />

6.74 DC Scott examined the two men’s travel documentation and asked about the purpose<br />

of their trip to the UK. He said that Mr Kovtun did not appear to be able to speak<br />

English, but that Mr Lugovoy could and answered the questions on behalf of them<br />

both. <strong>The</strong> men said that they were travelling for business. <strong>The</strong>y gave a name that<br />

DC Scott wrote down as Mr ‘Shadray’, but which must have been a reference to<br />

Dr Shadrin. <strong>The</strong>y also gave a phone number which DC Scott called – it was the offices<br />

at 58 Grosvenor Street of Dr Shadrin’s two companies, Continental Petroleum Limited<br />

and ECO3 Capital Limited. DC Scott was told by someone there that Mr Lugovoy and<br />

Mr Kovtun were visiting ECO3 Capital.<br />

6.75 It appeared from his evidence that DC Scott was uneasy about Mr Lugovoy and<br />

Mr Kovtun. He explained that the two men:<br />

“were very evasive as to why they were coming to the UK… as I asked them<br />

questions, they weren’t coming out with the answers that I wanted to hear or<br />

expected to hear. <strong>The</strong>y were giving me very, very short answers, so there was no<br />

information in those answers.” 49<br />

6.76 Ultimately, however, once he had telephoned Dr Shadrin’s offices and completed his<br />

standard checks, DC Scott considered that he had no power to hold the two men any<br />

longer and therefore let them proceed.<br />

6.77 DC Scott estimated that the two men left him at about 11.50am. 50 It seems likely<br />

that they in fact left him a few minutes earlier, since the telephone schedule records<br />

Mr Lugovoy making calls on his mobile phone to Dr Shadrin and then to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

at 11.45am and 11.46am respectively. 51<br />

6.78 As we shall see, later on the same day Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun met Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

and together attended a meeting with Mr Reilly. It seems reasonable to assume that<br />

Mr Lugovoy’s brief call to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> at 11.46 that morning was about that meeting,<br />

particularly since the records show that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> called Mr Reilly a few minutes<br />

later. 52<br />

6.79 <strong>The</strong> meeting with Mr Reilly was to take place at 3.00pm. Prior to that, Mr Lugovoy<br />

and Mr Kovtun travelled into London and booked in at their hotel, the Best Western in<br />

Shaftesbury Avenue.<br />

47<br />

Scott 9/39<br />

48<br />

INQ013787 (page 4)<br />

49<br />

Scott 9/43-44<br />

50<br />

Scott 9/47<br />

51<br />

INQ017809 (page 58)<br />

52<br />

Reilly 10/83<br />

Part 6 | Chapters 1 to 8 | <strong>The</strong> polonium trail – events in October and November 2006<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!