21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

2429870

2429870

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part 4 | Chapters 1 to 6 | Why would anyone wish to kill Alexander <strong>Litvinenko</strong>?<br />

these matters, is also consistent with a number of documents that I admitted into<br />

evidence. Mr Goldfarb referred to the contents of these documents when giving oral<br />

evidence. 95<br />

4.98 A US diplomatic cable dated 31 August 2009 published on the Wikileaks website 96<br />

described two operations, codenamed Avispa and Troika, that the Spanish authorities<br />

carried out against members of Russian organised crime groups in or about 2005 and<br />

2006. <strong>The</strong> cable referred to allegations made in the Spanish press that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

had; “tipped off Spanish security officials on the location, roles and activities of<br />

several ‘Russian’ mafia figures with ties to Spain.” <strong>The</strong> cable went on to assert that<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> “allegedly provided information on Izguilov, Zakhar Kalashov and Tariel<br />

Oniani to GOS [Government of Spain] officials during a May 2006 meeting.”<br />

4.99 A further US cable published on Wikileaks appears to provide further support to the<br />

idea that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> was assisting Spanish authorities in their investigations into<br />

Russian organised crime. This cable, dated 8 February 2010, 97 refers to the Spanish<br />

prosecutor heading the investigation, named Jose Grinda Gonzales, quoting what he<br />

described as a “thesis” by Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>. <strong>The</strong> ‘thesis’ was that: “the Russian intelligence<br />

and security services … the FSB, the SVR and the GRU – control organised crime<br />

in Russia.” <strong>The</strong> cable further records Mr Grinda as having stated that he himself,<br />

“believes this thesis is accurate”.<br />

4.100 If Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> did provide the type of assistance to the Spanish authorities that was<br />

described in the evidence that I have summarised above – and in particular if it is<br />

true that he was due to give evidence about these matters in court – the question that<br />

arises for the purposes of this <strong>Inquiry</strong> is whether there could have been any connection<br />

between those matters and his death. Is it possible, for example, that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

was killed in order either to punish him for assisting the Spanish authorities, or to<br />

prevent him offering any further assistance, including perhaps giving evidence in<br />

court? I shall return to this issue below.<br />

95<br />

Goldfarb 26/61-67<br />

96<br />

BLK000049<br />

97<br />

INQ015639<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!