21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

2429870

2429870

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part 9 | Chapters 1 to 12 | Who directed the killing?<br />

Chapter 10: Russian State responsibility –<br />

events since Alexander <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s<br />

death<br />

9.164 It is apparent that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> was not mourned long in Russia, at least not by<br />

the government. Leading politicians made speeches attacking Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> and<br />

even implying that he had deserved his fate (some of which I have referred to in<br />

chapter 2 of Part 4 above). It has been suggested that British and German police<br />

investigating Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s death received less than full cooperation from their<br />

Russian counterparts. <strong>The</strong> Russian government refused a request made by the<br />

British government to extradite Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun to face criminal charges.<br />

Mr Lugovoy has been lionised in Russia. He has become a member of the Duma, and<br />

indeed was awarded an honour by President Putin during the course of the <strong>Inquiry</strong>’s<br />

hearings.<br />

9.165 <strong>The</strong> question for present purposes is whether any of these matters amount to evidence<br />

that the Russian government was actually involved in Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s murder.<br />

Engagement with the criminal investigations<br />

Russian aircraft not made available for testing<br />

9.166 I have referred during the course of the narrative in Part 6 above to two occasions on<br />

which British and German police investigators respectively were not able to inspect<br />

Russian passenger aircraft that were of interest to their enquiries.<br />

9.167 One of those planes was that on which Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun had flown from<br />

Moscow to London on 16 October 2006 – Transaero EI-DDK (see above at paragraph<br />

6.69). <strong>The</strong> other was the Aeroflot aircraft on which Mr Kovtun flew from Moscow to<br />

Hamburg on 28 October 2006 (see paragraph 6.199 above).<br />

9.168 I do not think that it would be safe to draw any inferences about responsibility for<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s death from these two incidents. <strong>The</strong>re is insufficient evidence to be<br />

clear as to exactly what happened. Moreover, the two aircraft were operated by two<br />

independent companies. Even on the assumption that the aircraft were deliberately<br />

replaced on the schedules to avoid them being tested, there is no evidence on which<br />

I can safely determine whether this was done at the instigation of the airlines to avoid<br />

delay and disruption, or at the instigation of the Russian government, perhaps for<br />

more sinister reasons.<br />

Metropolitan Police Service visit to Moscow, December 2006<br />

9.169 In December 2006, officers from the Metropolitan Police team investigating<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s death made a formal visit to Moscow to interview witnesses. I heard<br />

evidence from two officers who went on the trip to Moscow – Mr Tarpey 70 and<br />

Mr Slater. 71<br />

70<br />

Tarpey 22/25-90<br />

71<br />

Slater 22/91-118<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!