21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

2429870

2429870

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 6 | Chapters 1 to 8 | <strong>The</strong> polonium trail – events in October and November 2006<br />

2006, Mr Lugovoy stated, “On 1 November 2006, Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> called me and offered<br />

to meet”. 255 When he subsequently gave an account of that day to Bruce Burgess<br />

at the time of the polygraph test, Mr Lugovoy made the same point in slightly more<br />

colourful terms:<br />

“On the day of the football match I received a call from <strong>Litvinenko</strong> who insistently<br />

asked me to meet him. I said I did not have time, let’s meet say tomorrow. He said<br />

No, no, we must meet today.” 256<br />

6.277 Mr Kovtun gave a very similar account in his statement of 2 June 2015: 257<br />

“I remember that on that day, with the sense of urgency typical of him, <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

proactively telephoned Lugovoy 5-8 times on a mobile telephone saying that he<br />

was not far away from the hotel and asking if he could come to see us. Lugovoy’s<br />

reply to him was that there would be hardly any time to talk because he was taking<br />

his family to a football match. In other words, it was up to <strong>Litvinenko</strong> whether he<br />

came or not. During the telephone conversations Lugovoy and I were in Shadrin’s<br />

office.”<br />

6.278 Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> gave a very different account when he was interviewed by Detective<br />

Inspector (DI) Hyatt in his hospital bed.<br />

6.279 Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> said that the two men had planned to meet on 2 November, but that on<br />

1 November Mr Lugovoy, “called me in the morning and said he had already arrived<br />

and he would like to meet for a short time on the 1 st ”. He said that they had then<br />

arranged to meet at about 5.00 that afternoon at the Millennium Hotel, but that later in<br />

the day they had spoken again and the meeting had been brought forward – on that<br />

occasion Mr Lugovoy had said, “come quicker, I am waiting for you”. 258<br />

6.280 <strong>The</strong> telephone schedule has in fact made it possible to resolve the differences between<br />

these rival accounts. 259 Put shortly, the schedule shows that the differences between<br />

the accounts fall to be resolved in favour of Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s version of events. <strong>The</strong><br />

following points emerge:<br />

a. <strong>The</strong> very first call between Mr Lugovoy and Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> following Mr Lugovoy’s<br />

arrival in London was made by Mr Lugovoy shortly after 9.00 on the evening of<br />

31 October. <strong>The</strong> call lasted some six minutes<br />

b. <strong>The</strong> next communication between the two was another call made by Mr Lugovoy<br />

to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>, this time at 11.41am the next morning. This was the call made<br />

a few minutes after Mr Kovtun’s call to C2. It is consistent with Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s<br />

recollection of Mr Lugovoy calling him on the morning of 1 November<br />

c. <strong>The</strong> fact that the first two calls between the two men during this trip were made<br />

from Mr Lugovoy to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> is strongly inconsistent with the accounts given<br />

by Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun<br />

255<br />

INQ002058<br />

256<br />

INQ017779 (page 6)<br />

257<br />

INQ021208 (page 5)<br />

258<br />

<strong>The</strong> relevant extracts from Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s interview transcripts are discussed at Mascall 16/60-62; <br />

16/78-82<br />

259<br />

INQ020044 (pages 3-5) <br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!