The Litvinenko Inquiry
2429870
2429870
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Part 6 | Chapters 1 to 8 | <strong>The</strong> polonium trail – events in October and November 2006<br />
2006, Mr Lugovoy stated, “On 1 November 2006, Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> called me and offered<br />
to meet”. 255 When he subsequently gave an account of that day to Bruce Burgess<br />
at the time of the polygraph test, Mr Lugovoy made the same point in slightly more<br />
colourful terms:<br />
“On the day of the football match I received a call from <strong>Litvinenko</strong> who insistently<br />
asked me to meet him. I said I did not have time, let’s meet say tomorrow. He said<br />
No, no, we must meet today.” 256<br />
6.277 Mr Kovtun gave a very similar account in his statement of 2 June 2015: 257<br />
“I remember that on that day, with the sense of urgency typical of him, <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />
proactively telephoned Lugovoy 5-8 times on a mobile telephone saying that he<br />
was not far away from the hotel and asking if he could come to see us. Lugovoy’s<br />
reply to him was that there would be hardly any time to talk because he was taking<br />
his family to a football match. In other words, it was up to <strong>Litvinenko</strong> whether he<br />
came or not. During the telephone conversations Lugovoy and I were in Shadrin’s<br />
office.”<br />
6.278 Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> gave a very different account when he was interviewed by Detective<br />
Inspector (DI) Hyatt in his hospital bed.<br />
6.279 Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> said that the two men had planned to meet on 2 November, but that on<br />
1 November Mr Lugovoy, “called me in the morning and said he had already arrived<br />
and he would like to meet for a short time on the 1 st ”. He said that they had then<br />
arranged to meet at about 5.00 that afternoon at the Millennium Hotel, but that later in<br />
the day they had spoken again and the meeting had been brought forward – on that<br />
occasion Mr Lugovoy had said, “come quicker, I am waiting for you”. 258<br />
6.280 <strong>The</strong> telephone schedule has in fact made it possible to resolve the differences between<br />
these rival accounts. 259 Put shortly, the schedule shows that the differences between<br />
the accounts fall to be resolved in favour of Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s version of events. <strong>The</strong><br />
following points emerge:<br />
a. <strong>The</strong> very first call between Mr Lugovoy and Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> following Mr Lugovoy’s<br />
arrival in London was made by Mr Lugovoy shortly after 9.00 on the evening of<br />
31 October. <strong>The</strong> call lasted some six minutes<br />
b. <strong>The</strong> next communication between the two was another call made by Mr Lugovoy<br />
to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>, this time at 11.41am the next morning. This was the call made<br />
a few minutes after Mr Kovtun’s call to C2. It is consistent with Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s<br />
recollection of Mr Lugovoy calling him on the morning of 1 November<br />
c. <strong>The</strong> fact that the first two calls between the two men during this trip were made<br />
from Mr Lugovoy to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> is strongly inconsistent with the accounts given<br />
by Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun<br />
255<br />
INQ002058<br />
256<br />
INQ017779 (page 6)<br />
257<br />
INQ021208 (page 5)<br />
258<br />
<strong>The</strong> relevant extracts from Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s interview transcripts are discussed at Mascall 16/60-62; <br />
16/78-82<br />
259<br />
INQ020044 (pages 3-5) <br />
165