21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

2429870

2429870

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 6 | Chapters 1 to 8 | <strong>The</strong> polonium trail – events in October and November 2006<br />

6.318 Several of the results, however, are worthy of particular attention.<br />

6.319 Secondary contamination was found in room 441, the room shared by Mr Lugovoy<br />

and his wife and young son. Very much higher readings were, however, found in room<br />

382, which was shared by Mr Kovtun and Mr Sokolenko. <strong>The</strong> highest readings were<br />

found in the bathroom and the highest of those readings was found in a sediment<br />

trap below the plughole in that bathroom. <strong>The</strong> expert evidence of A1 was that these<br />

readings were only consistent with primary contamination. 296 It therefore appeared that<br />

polonium in one form or another had been poured down the plughole. <strong>The</strong> comparison<br />

with the contamination found in room 107 at the Best Western Hotel is striking.<br />

6.320 Very high readings, which in A1’s view were also consistent with primary contamination,<br />

were additionally found in two places in the Pine Bar.<br />

6.321 In the bar itself, primary contamination was found on the table which Mr Andrade<br />

had described as table 1 (in fact, two tables pushed together) and also on one of the<br />

chairs at the next table. It is to be noted that there was a gap of several weeks after<br />

1 November before the Pine Bar was sealed as a crime scene, and Mr Andrade’s<br />

evidence was that the chairs in the bar, and also on occasions the tables, were<br />

sometimes moved around. 297<br />

296<br />

A1 20/65-68<br />

297<br />

Andrade 16/140-141<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!