Food Insecurity, Conflict, and Stability KIMBERLY FLOWERS FOOD INSECURITY IS BOTH A CONSEQUENCE AND A CAUSE OF CONFLICT, MAKING IT INEXORABLY LINKED WITH POLITICAL STABILITY AT REGIONAL, NATIONAL, AND INTERNATIONAL LEVELS. Lack of access to affordable food has proven to trigger revolutions and spark unrest across the world. The first signs of the Arab Spring were riots in Algeria and Tunisia in 2011 over dramatic increases in the prices of dietary staples such as sugar, oil, and flour. The food-price crisis of 2007–2008 caused dozens of protests across the globe, serving as a wakeup call to the international community and the United States that investments in sustainable agricultural development are critical to political stability and national security. 128 | Center for Strategic and International Studies
Food should be considered a political commodity. It is often used as a strategic instrument of war, with evidence spanning from clashing groups in 1990s Sudan to Bashar al-Assad’s war-torn Syria today. Agricultural markets sustain and stabilize many economies around the world, as well provide food to the hungry bellies of populations that may already be dissatisfied with high levels of unemployment, government corruption, or violence in their communities. Hungry populations are more likely to express frustration with troubled leadership, perpetuating a cycle of political instability and further undermining long-term economic development. In 2016, regions within the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa will be most sensitive to food insecurity, and several countries are likely to suffer political unrest and costly humanitarian crises because of their inability to meet their populations’ basic food demands. Syria is the biggest humanitarian crisis of this generation, and the situation continues to deteriorate. Nearly 10 million Syrians are unable to meet their daily food needs. The ongoing conflict has disrupted agricultural production, markets, and critical infrastructure, causing billions of dollars in damage that will take decades to reverse. Syria’s GDP, once tied to a thriving agricultural sector, has been significantly compromised. A UN report in March of this year estimated total economic loss since the start of the conflict was more than $200 billion. Farmers are fleeing their lands indefinitely, and the massive refugee exodus is placing pressure on neighboring countries, from Jordan and Israel to many parts of Europe and the United States. Evidence of food as a weapon of war is rampant across all factions and dimensions of the Syrian conflict. President Assad is waging a starvation campaign, purposely cutting populations off from humanitarian assistance. The Islamic State is using food as a recruitment tool, luring in weak citizens desperate for food and then folding vulnerable young men into their ranks. Points along the Turkey-Syria border that are used as aid-distribution sites have become violent hot spots controlled by armed men ready to use humanitarian aid as valuable leverage. Meanwhile, Yemen is facing a possible famine brought on by the perfect storm of severe drought and violent conflict. Civil war threats from numerous rebel groups have exacerbated an already-weak system: before the crisis, 42 percent of the population was food insecure, the country imported over 90 percent of its food, and there was serious water scarcity. Now, a staggering 21 million people out of a population of 24.8 million are in need of urgent humanitarian assistance, including 13 million people who do not have enough to eat. In addition, the conflict escalated this year around the same time as the typical cropping season, from March to June, so the 2015 crop production will be much below average. South Sudan’s current crisis is a reminder of how important a reliable food system is to sustainable state building. Up to 95 percent of the population is dependent on agriculture for their livelihood, yet there is no underlying state infrastructure—roads and irrigation systems, for example—to support the agricultural industry. Today, an estimated 40 percent of the country cannot afford or access enough food to fulfill their daily needs, with populations facing emergency levels of acute food insecurity in conflict-affected areas. The dangerous combination of armed conflict, weak infrastructure, devalued currency, and soaring staple food prices could result in famine conditions in 2016 if South Sudan does not receive sufficient humanitarian aid. Global Forecast 2016 | 129
- Page 1:
2016 GLOBAL FORECAST editors CRAIG
- Page 4 and 5:
about csis For over 50 years, the C
- Page 6 and 7:
Introduction CRAIG COHEN WASHINGTON
- Page 8 and 9:
6 | Center for Strategic and Intern
- Page 10 and 11:
Reconnecting of Asia JOHN J. HAMRE
- Page 12 and 13:
10 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 14 and 15:
America’s Changing Role in the Wo
- Page 16 and 17:
A selective engagement approach to
- Page 18 and 19:
tional, military, and economic mean
- Page 20 and 21:
18 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 22 and 23:
ole in international affairs. Now w
- Page 24 and 25:
22 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 26 and 27:
ISIS (Re)Writes History JON B. ALTE
- Page 28 and 29:
enth-century society of pious belie
- Page 30 and 31:
and daily exhibitions of terror and
- Page 32 and 33:
Iran after the Agreement ANTHONY H.
- Page 34 and 35:
understanding that the United State
- Page 36 and 37:
Israeli military leaders predict th
- Page 38 and 39:
36 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 40 and 41:
Putin’s Europe HEATHER A. CONLEY
- Page 42 and 43:
far-right, anti-Semitic Jobbik part
- Page 44 and 45:
Predicting Russian behavior is hard
- Page 46 and 47:
A NATO Strategy for the Eastern Fla
- Page 48 and 49:
Sino-Russian Cooperation JEFFREY MA
- Page 50 and 51:
Interbank Financial Transaction) sy
- Page 52 and 53:
50 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 54 and 55:
Reform Cold, Politics Hot: Presiden
- Page 56 and 57:
pushing ahead more aggressively on
- Page 58 and 59:
not just hypothetical; they are alr
- Page 60 and 61:
Geopolitical Consequences of China
- Page 62 and 63:
Chinese leaders are actively pursui
- Page 64 and 65:
62 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 66 and 67:
By 2030, the Asia-Pacific region wi
- Page 68 and 69:
is not expected to be a major playe
- Page 70 and 71:
North Korean Vulnerability? VICTOR
- Page 72 and 73:
downturn in the country’s stock e
- Page 75 and 76:
PART 6 africa
- Page 77 and 78:
Responses in Nigeria, South Africa,
- Page 79 and 80: Terrorism in Sub-Saharan Africa THO
- Page 81 and 82: states, sustaining itself through k
- Page 83 and 84: PART 7 inside the pentagon Global F
- Page 85 and 86: Three Fiscal Futures In the final w
- Page 87 and 88: The Battle over How to Save Defense
- Page 89: apid acquisition actually happened
- Page 92 and 93: 90 | Center for Strategic and Inter
- Page 94 and 95: What is one of the most significant
- Page 96 and 97: Nuclear Deterrence in a Disordered
- Page 98 and 99: The Need for Global Zero SHARON SQU
- Page 100 and 101: faith on effective measures relatin
- Page 102 and 103: Increased interest in missile-based
- Page 104 and 105: state and substate actors has becom
- Page 107 and 108: PART 9 energy and security
- Page 109 and 110: Implications of Sustained Low Oil P
- Page 111 and 112: e used to partially offset this “
- Page 113 and 114: Linking Subnational and Supranation
- Page 115 and 116: Efficacy of Sanctions against Energ
- Page 117: Iran. Both Russia and Iran can accu
- Page 120 and 121: Responding to the Closing of Democr
- Page 122 and 123: er to support the consolidation of
- Page 124 and 125: Soft Power and Security DANIEL RUND
- Page 126 and 127: After the Ebola Catastrophe J. STEP
- Page 128 and 129: sense of—and account for—the wi
- Page 132 and 133: Despite its impressive economic gro
- Page 134 and 135: prisoners in a gesture of good fait
- Page 136 and 137: Winning the War of Ideas FARAH PAND
- Page 138 and 139: versity of religious belief, includ
- Page 140 and 141: contributors JON B. ALTERMAN is a s
- Page 142 and 143: MICHAEL J. GREEN is senior vice pre
- Page 144 and 145: FARAH PANDITH is a senior fellow at
- Page 147: Blank