You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
CRAIG COHEN<br />
WASHINGTON THINK TANKS EXIST AND OPER-<br />
ATE IN A MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS. A few of these<br />
ideas eventually become policy. Most do not. Like<br />
any entrepreneurial venture, there is no magic formula<br />
for success.<br />
Because of the muddiness of the policymaking<br />
process, a sense of mystery surrounds think tanks.<br />
Many people do not understand what a think tank<br />
does, how it operates, or what role it plays in a<br />
policy setting. This leads some to exaggerate their<br />
influence, and others to ascribe negative motives<br />
or methods.<br />
This confusion derives in part from a focus that is<br />
almost uniformly on the supply side of the equation—how<br />
think tanks seek to have influence. To<br />
understand why think tanks are the way they are,<br />
one must begin with the demand side. Why do<br />
think tanks exist in the first place?<br />
If you are a government official, foreign policy reporter,<br />
corporate representative with an international<br />
ambit, or civil society representative, a major<br />
part of your job is understanding what is happening<br />
in the world, what is happening in Washington, and<br />
what is likely to change in the coming months and<br />
years ahead. Despite the gigabytes of information<br />
at everyone’s fingertips, answering these questions<br />
is becoming harder, not easier.<br />
There is not a Washington consensus on many policy<br />
prescriptions today, but there is broad agreement<br />
on the complex nature of the environment<br />
that exists and how it resists simple solutions.<br />
Almost every think tank report will tell you that<br />
today’s world is not binary, static, or predictable.<br />
Problems are multidimensional, and there is a high<br />
degree of complexity. The pace at which people<br />
and ideas circulate is rapidly accelerating. Secrecy<br />
is more difficult to ensure—not just for government<br />
but for the private sector as well. Trust in institutions<br />
is at an all-time low.<br />
For your average official in Washington, there is too<br />
much noise, too many issues to cover, and too little<br />
time to think strategically. It is difficult to know<br />
where to turn for ground truth given the polarization<br />
of our domestic politics. The private sector,<br />
which may have been a source of credible outside<br />
advice in the past, is increasingly distant from government.<br />
And today’s budget realities do not lend<br />
themselves to integrated, innovative thinking, instead<br />
breeding caution and in-fighting.<br />
People look out their windows and see uncertain-<br />
4 | Center for Strategic and International Studies