07.12.2012 Views

Part 1 – A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment - IUCN

Part 1 – A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment - IUCN

Part 1 – A Rapid Participatory Biodiversity Assessment - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IUCN</strong> <strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Part</strong>icipatory <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Annex 2: A <strong>Rapid</strong> & <strong>Part</strong>icipatory <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Methodology<br />

The <strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Part</strong>icipatory <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> methodology used enabled assessment teams<br />

to gather key information on biodiversity and related ecosystem services in the study area and<br />

ground truth these findings through a series of field missions in selected landscapes surrounding<br />

local community settlements. The RPBA methodology’s main advantage lies in its straightforward<br />

approach to gathering scientific information on natural resource used by local communities,<br />

through their active engagement in the process.<br />

1. Scoping and Secondary Data Gathering<br />

RPBAs draw substantially on secondary information. This information was gathered and analysed<br />

for key issue areas and information gaps. This analysis then informed the focus of the<br />

assessment field missions which sought to test and ground truth these initial findings. Data<br />

gathering during the scoping stages involved:<br />

Initial scoping interviews<br />

In preparation for the field reconnaissance mission, <strong>IUCN</strong> carried out a pre departure consultation<br />

exercise in Vientiane involving a mixture of email exchanges, phone conversations and face to<br />

face meetings with the following stakeholders<br />

1. Mr. Bounkong Souvimonh Coordinator, Agrobiodiversity Project, National Agriculture and<br />

Forestry Research Institute<br />

2. Mr. Hongthong Sirivath, Project Coordinator, Village Focus International Laos<br />

3. Mr. John Dingley, Senior Technical Adviser, UXO Lao<br />

4. Mr. Patrick Brandelard, Belgian Project Coordinator, Lao-Belgian Village Development<br />

Programme<br />

5. Mr. Phillip Miller, Country Director, Concern Worldwide<br />

6. Mr. Richard Jackson, Manager, Social and Community Relations-Asia, Oxiana/LXML<br />

(Vientiane HQ)<br />

7. Mr. Rob Kelly, Manager, Village Focus International Laos<br />

8. Mr. Rob Solomon, Project Director, World Concern Lao PDR, Salavan<br />

9. Mr. Roger Mallot, World Wide Fund for Nature. Laos<br />

10. Mr. Serge Verniau, Representative, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization in<br />

Laos<br />

11. Mr. Somsanouk Phommakhot, Department of Environment, Water Resources and<br />

Environment Agency<br />

12. Mr. Troy Hansel, Wildlife Conservation Society, Laos<br />

13. Mr. Vongxay, Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development project<br />

14. Ms. Bernadette Wardle, Environment Manager, Oxiana/LXML (Vientiane HQ)<br />

15. Ms. Mr. Phetsamay Douangmalalay, Project Officer, Village Focus International Laos<br />

16. Ms. Tu Anh Vu, Agriculture <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Officer, United Nations Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization in Laos<br />

These discussions provided an opportunity to briefly explain the current <strong>IUCN</strong> assessment; they<br />

also yielded important information on the project area including:<br />

• Information on organisations working in the assessment area<br />

• Secondary information on the biodiversity and the socio-economic situation in or around<br />

the assessment area<br />

• Other important stakeholders to contact<br />

These exchanges continued on the side of the official stakeholder forums held in Salavan and<br />

Sepon.<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!