AAHS ASPN ASRM - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association ...
AAHS ASPN ASRM - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association ...
AAHS ASPN ASRM - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity of the SIEA, DIEP, and ms-TRAM Flaps for Breast Reconstruction<br />
Institution where the work was prepared: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA<br />
Liza C. Wu, MD; Anureet Bajaj; David W. Chang, MD; Pierre Chevray, MD, PhD; University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center<br />
Purpose:<br />
Lower abdominal tissue remains the gold standard for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. The TRAM flap harvest technique has evolved to reduce donor<br />
site morbidity. This is a comparative study of the donor site function and outcomes of patients who have undergone SIEA flap, DIEP flap, or free ms-TRAM<br />
flap breast reconstruction. We investigate the postoperative morbidity and complications and examine patient perceptions of abdominal donor site aesthetics,<br />
pain, and function.<br />
Methods:<br />
A 12-item questionnaire was sent to elicit patient perceptions regarding donor site aesthetics, pain, and function. A retrospective chart review was used to<br />
obtain demographic data and outcomes with regard to donor site complications.<br />
Results:<br />
179 patients during a 5-year period were included in the study. There were 126 unilateral breast reconstruction patients (23 SIEA, 24 DIEP, 79 ms-TRAM), and<br />
53 bilateral reconstruction patients (6 SIEA/SIEA, 5 SIEA/DIEP, 7 SIEA/ms-TRAM, 8 DIEP/DIEP, 4 DIEP/ms-TRAM, 23 ms-TRAM/ms-TRAM). The survey response<br />
rate was 63%. There was no difference between responders and non-responders with regard to follow-up, BMI, timing of surgery, flap type, smoking history,<br />
or comorbidity. For the patients with a unilateral breast reconstruction, there was no perceived difference between the SIEA vs. DIEP flap patients with regard<br />
to abdominal contour, postoperative pain, or abdominal function. There was no difference between the SIEA vs. ms-TRAM flap patients with regard to abdominal<br />
contour. There was a trend toward SIEA patients having less postoperative pain than ms-TRAM patients. There was a statistically significant difference<br />
(p