1LwjabT
1LwjabT
1LwjabT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
31<br />
32<br />
33<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
37<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
43<br />
44<br />
45<br />
46<br />
47<br />
48<br />
49<br />
50<br />
Mary Darlene Yates<br />
mdarlene317@yahoo.com<br />
Owner:<br />
3127 Yates Road<br />
Hillsborough, NC 27278<br />
&<br />
6421 New Sharon Church Road<br />
Rougemont, NC 27572<br />
Robert Terry Woods<br />
rterrywoods34607@yahoo.com<br />
Owner:<br />
3806 Stoneycreek Road<br />
Chapel Hill, NC 27514<br />
Good morning<br />
I'm sure you know what this is about, I feel like we have way too many regulations on us now,<br />
don't tell me what and when I can do certain things on my property.<br />
I'm sure there has been some complaints in the last few years because of the increase in<br />
firearms purchases, caused by the fear of the increased government control and restrictions.<br />
So, please take into consideration my complaint and many other private landowners in the<br />
county. No new government restrictions.<br />
Thank you<br />
Brad Walker<br />
919-730-9327<br />
Hello Commissioners,<br />
My two cents:<br />
I am one of the planning representatives for Bingham. I agree that people should have more<br />
time to digest the proposal and weigh in on it if they want to.<br />
Comparing the Proposed Orange County Ordinance to the Lenoir Ordinance they are very<br />
similar with Orange County’s addition of some key points;<br />
1) The setback buffers which are common sense safety measures, but are made<br />
redundant by criminal and civil penalties<br />
2) Regulations for indoor ranges which are also made redundant by criminal and civil<br />
penalties<br />
3) Time of day restrictions<br />
4) The exclusion of “explosive targets”. These targets are unregulated by the BATF and<br />
likely magnify the number of noise complaints. Their effects should be covered by the<br />
noise ordinance, but it’s sometimes hard to locate and enforce..<br />
5) Sign posting regulations which are about the same as posting “no hunting” signs, as I<br />
recall the discussion.