19.03.2016 Views

1LwjabT

1LwjabT

1LwjabT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

44<br />

45<br />

46<br />

47<br />

48<br />

49<br />

50<br />

Mary Darlene Yates<br />

mdarlene317@yahoo.com<br />

Owner:<br />

3127 Yates Road<br />

Hillsborough, NC 27278<br />

&<br />

6421 New Sharon Church Road<br />

Rougemont, NC 27572<br />

Robert Terry Woods<br />

rterrywoods34607@yahoo.com<br />

Owner:<br />

3806 Stoneycreek Road<br />

Chapel Hill, NC 27514<br />

Good morning<br />

I'm sure you know what this is about, I feel like we have way too many regulations on us now,<br />

don't tell me what and when I can do certain things on my property.<br />

I'm sure there has been some complaints in the last few years because of the increase in<br />

firearms purchases, caused by the fear of the increased government control and restrictions.<br />

So, please take into consideration my complaint and many other private landowners in the<br />

county. No new government restrictions.<br />

Thank you<br />

Brad Walker<br />

919-730-9327<br />

Hello Commissioners,<br />

My two cents:<br />

I am one of the planning representatives for Bingham. I agree that people should have more<br />

time to digest the proposal and weigh in on it if they want to.<br />

Comparing the Proposed Orange County Ordinance to the Lenoir Ordinance they are very<br />

similar with Orange County’s addition of some key points;<br />

1) The setback buffers which are common sense safety measures, but are made<br />

redundant by criminal and civil penalties<br />

2) Regulations for indoor ranges which are also made redundant by criminal and civil<br />

penalties<br />

3) Time of day restrictions<br />

4) The exclusion of “explosive targets”. These targets are unregulated by the BATF and<br />

likely magnify the number of noise complaints. Their effects should be covered by the<br />

noise ordinance, but it’s sometimes hard to locate and enforce..<br />

5) Sign posting regulations which are about the same as posting “no hunting” signs, as I<br />

recall the discussion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!