1LwjabT
1LwjabT
1LwjabT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
32<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
31<br />
32<br />
33<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
37<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
43<br />
44<br />
45<br />
46<br />
47<br />
48<br />
49<br />
50<br />
Efland, NC 27243<br />
Scott Tutor<br />
Orange Grove Community<br />
Bingham Township<br />
Earl I heard this weekend that the county has had the county Attorney start working on a new<br />
law that will not let anyone in the county that owns land fire there guns on there own property<br />
more than once a month and only between the hours of like 10: 00 am and 3:00 pm is there any<br />
truth to this. Please Reply Thanks Jerry<br />
Jerry Baity<br />
To: Earl McKee, Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners<br />
From: F. Paul Valone, president, Grass Roots North Carolina<br />
Re: Amendment to Orange County Code Of Ordinances Regulating Discharge Of Firearms<br />
Dear Commissioner McKee:<br />
We have been advised by several members that Orange County intends to change its<br />
ordinance regarding discharge of firearms. They have also advised us that the board of<br />
commissioners intends to do so in a meeting closed to the public.<br />
In fact, one member forwarded the attached image of the Action Agenda Item Abstract which<br />
appears to show it as item 7–a, for action on February 16, 2016. I also note that the public<br />
hearing block contains an “N”, presumably indicating no public hearing on the issue.<br />
As you are no doubt aware, NCGS § 143-318.9 (our "open meetings" law) stipulates:<br />
“Whereas the public bodies that administer the legislative, policy-making, quasi-judicial,<br />
administrative, and advisory functions of North Carolina and its political subdivisions<br />
exist solely to conduct the people's business, it is the public policy of North Carolina that<br />
the hearings, deliberations, and actions of these bodies be conducted openly.”<br />
In fact, public bodies may go into closed session only for the purposes enumerated in § 143-<br />
318.11, which also says:<br />
“A public body may hold a closed session only upon a motion duly made and adopted at<br />
an open meeting. Every motion to close a meeting shall cite one or more of the<br />
permissible purposes listed in subsection (a) of this section.”<br />
I would also urge you to become familiar with another modification of North Carolina statutes<br />
which became effective on December 1, 2015 when N.C.G.S. § 14–415.23 was modified under<br />
Section 15 of Session Law 2015–195 (formerly H.B. 562) to include a new subsection (e), to<br />
wit:<br />
“A person adversely affected by any ordinance, rule, or regulation promulgated or<br />
caused to be enforced by any unit of local government in violation of this section may<br />
bring an action for declaratory and injunctive relief and for actual damages arising<br />
from the violation. The court shall award the prevailing party in an action brought