19.03.2016 Views

1LwjabT

1LwjabT

1LwjabT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

44<br />

45<br />

46<br />

47<br />

48<br />

49<br />

50<br />

51<br />

D. ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING<br />

The public hearing was adjourned at 7:26 p.m.<br />

E. WORK SESSION<br />

1. Review of Minimum Lot Size and Density Allowances for Subdivisions – To review<br />

and discuss the County’s subdivision development and review processes focusing<br />

primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the clustering of<br />

proposed subdivision lots.<br />

David Stancil, Department of the Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation<br />

(DEAPR) Director provided background regarding the Rural Character Study. He said in 1987,<br />

the BOCC created a Joint Planning Area with the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said<br />

part of this Joint Planning Area was the designation of the Rural Buffer. He said the mechanism<br />

to implement this rural buffer was the implementation of the two-acre minimum lot size. He said<br />

a study committee was created to consider how best to protect the rural integrity of the land. He<br />

said the first area focused on the rural buffer, and the second area focused on the remaining<br />

rural areas of the County. He said, simply put, the conclusion was to create a sliding scale<br />

between open space and the ability to achieve a smaller lot size. He said a great deal of<br />

thought went into the decisions and the process was a high point in his time in Orange County.<br />

Craig Benedict said Orange County’s population has increased by about 50,000 people<br />

since the rural character study was completed. He said the majority of these people went into<br />

the cities but about 45% went into the unincorporated area. He said the original goals of the<br />

study started out as an open space preservation plan, balancing agricultural protection. He said<br />

the interesting part of this report is that, in large part, cooperation with the plan was voluntary.<br />

He said developers would submit two plans: a conventional one (10 acres, divided into five 2-<br />

acre lots), and a flexible plan (10 acres, with five 1-acre lots, and five acres of open space). He<br />

said the plans were reviewed, and the decision of which plan to use was placed on the<br />

developer. He said initially the majority of developers chose the conventional plans but slowly<br />

moved towards flexible plans. He said the process moved from voluntary to being a bit more<br />

direct, in order to achieve the outlined goals.<br />

Craig Benedict said the conversation now shifts to the next 50,000 people moving into<br />

Orange County and considering where they will live. He said projections are for lots of singlefamily<br />

development to occur in the rural buffer due to demand. He said one of the goals from<br />

the rural character study that remains in place today is the growth management goal: to have<br />

urban growth boundaries; to have efficient forms of development; balance the natural resource<br />

goals with pattern development and growth management.<br />

Commissioner Rich said there was previous discussion about the gross overstatement<br />

of projected population growth. She asked if there was an update on these numbers.<br />

Craig Benedict said the original numbers were done for the entire triangle region. He<br />

said he will give a presentation on March 2 to Planning Board about how these numbers were<br />

developed for the 2040 plan. He said the 2045 plan is currently being worked on and it is hoped<br />

that the control totals, which are provided to the County, can be reviewed and more appropriate<br />

estimates garnered. He said the formula for the projections (one house per every two acres),<br />

cannot be altered, but the numbers can be reviewed for realistic estimates.<br />

Michael Harvey, Orange County Current Planning, reviewed the following background<br />

and PowerPoint slides:<br />

PURPOSE: To review and discuss the County’s subdivision development and review<br />

processes focusing primarily on minimum lot size and density limitations as they relate to the<br />

clustering of subdivision lots. This item was developed to address a petition submitted by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!