14.04.2016 Views

Ambedkar-Philosophy of Hinduism

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AMBEDKAR'S PHILOSOPHY OF HINDUISM AND CONTEMPORARY CRITIQUES<br />

PROF. M. M. NINAN<br />

Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Jyotiba Phule, Vinayak Damodar Sawarkar<br />

" As the centuries elasped, different people in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country stood for the same cause. The<br />

examples for Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Jyotiba Phule etc. come handy. They stood with because <strong>of</strong> their love for<br />

Hindu society, and their intention to bring reform to it. The living epitome <strong>of</strong> valiance and fortitude, freedom fighter<br />

Vinayak Damodar Sawarkar, who had spent several years in Andaman prison (Kala Pani) had also started his<br />

battle against casteism coming back to his hometown.<br />

"Gandhi, however, had a different attitude towards this problem. When Sawarkar had pleaded to Gandhi to<br />

completely do away with caste system, Gandhi had termed the system to be one <strong>of</strong> the fundamentals <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hinduism</strong>, not just an obsolete facet, that could be done away with. He coined the term Harijan for those<br />

lower castes, but in effect, that compartmentalized the victims <strong>of</strong> casteism, paving way for separatist identity<br />

politics.<br />

"But there is a difference in fighting for unification and equality and fighting for a separate identiy. Unfortunately,<br />

while <strong>Ambedkar</strong> led his fight against Casteism, his writings only reveal his hatred against <strong>Hinduism</strong> and Islam both.<br />

For example, in “Phisolophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hinduism</strong>”, <strong>Ambedkar</strong> writes how Manu Smriti categorically advocates inequality<br />

and caste system. In fact, he even writes that Bhagwad Geeta and Vedas also promote inequality. However, while<br />

driving his point home, that <strong>Hinduism</strong> intrinsically promotes inequality, he does that with his in-built prejudices and<br />

well-nurtured hatred as we’ll soon see.<br />

"He mentions the Purush-sookta <strong>of</strong> the Vedas, and writes that Purushasukta recognises the division <strong>of</strong> society into<br />

four sections as an ideal and that the ideal relationship between the four sections is inequality. However, he doesn’t<br />

quote the exact meaning <strong>of</strong> Purush sukta which envisages different classes as different parts <strong>of</strong> human body. It<br />

compares Brahman to the head, Kshatriyas to the chest and arms, Vaishyas to the belly and thighs, and Shuras to<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!