15.04.2016 Views

Theodicy Soteriology, Hermeneutics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOTERIOLOGY : M. M. NINAN<br />

elementary particles that constitute the rocket. We do not bother about the particles; we plan<br />

for the system and give them the force and the guidance on an on going control process that<br />

it can strike the target without fail. If we want to understand the motion of water through a<br />

pipeline we may analyze it in terms of the motion of each molecule. But this will be<br />

impractical. Instead, we can analyze it in term of pressure head, velocity, and turbulence and<br />

eddies. These are collective properties of the fluid. They will then yield coherent and<br />

measurable results. The motion of individual molecules may be random within the kinetic<br />

theory in any system, yet we can still control it.<br />

This model is complicated by the introduction of persons. Persons are defined only in terms<br />

of free will and not otherwise. Free will implies choice. Thus there is a conflict in terminology<br />

when we speak of predestination of individuals. As some honest Calvinist will admit, man has<br />

no freewill. He is controlled by his nature, which in the fallen nature is to do only sin. Even<br />

when saved man is no more free. He can only do good. This is nothing more than the<br />

application of Dialectical materialism, which according to Karl Marx leads to Historical<br />

Materialism. Individuals are created by the society in which he lives. Historical Materialism<br />

however is dialectical in nature allowing for deviations within the society allowing for<br />

cooperating with the direction of movement of history or opposing it with all sorts of subtle<br />

shades and variations. Even a bourgoise like Engels could be a leader for Proletariat<br />

because of that. A rigid Mecahnistic Materialism would not allow for it.<br />

Thus history should be interpreted actually in terms of the interaction between free agents -<br />

Persons which all coexist with the intent and permission of God. God created man in his own<br />

image. Men are all children of God as we are reminded Luke's genealogy of Jesus. God<br />

created man as persons with free will, they remained people in spite of the fall. It is this<br />

interaction between man and man along with man and God that forms the history. Though<br />

good and evil are defined absolutely in terms of God's character in relations to the trinity<br />

(within themselves) the existence of good and evil in creation is the result of the interaction of<br />

man and creation. That is exactly why history is unpredictable. The direction of movement of<br />

history is determined by the forces within - including personalities and powers. God do not<br />

predestine it, but directs it. This is where the part of Christians comes in. That is what the<br />

sermon on the mount is all about.<br />

Application of this into the historical process gives some insight. Though there is absolute<br />

freedom of will in the context of the situation for every person with infinite variations of choice,<br />

history can be directed by God to achieve his desired end without infringement of this<br />

freedom. God may introduce elements into history to change the course when necessary.<br />

This is achieved by the signs and wonders he performed in the sight of people, the giving of<br />

the law, the prophets and finally the sending of his own son. In this age God does this<br />

through the Church. That is the purpose of the Church.<br />

250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!