eastern arc mountains forests of tanzania - Campaign for the ...
eastern arc mountains forests of tanzania - Campaign for the ...
eastern arc mountains forests of tanzania - Campaign for the ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Eastern Arc Mountains Forests <strong>of</strong> Tanzania<br />
6. Monitoring<br />
6.a Key indicators <strong>for</strong> measuring state <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
The Eastern Arc Mountains have a number <strong>of</strong> monitoring schemes in place that can provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on how well<br />
managed <strong>the</strong> property is.<br />
Protected Area coverage<br />
The national parks, nature reserves, national and local authority <strong>for</strong>est reserves, and village land <strong>for</strong>est reserves have<br />
been mapped in Tanzania. Digital versions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se maps have been compiled and have been made available within<br />
<strong>the</strong> World Database on Protected Areas (www.wdpa.org). Maintaining this database is a priority <strong>for</strong> UNEP-WCMC,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Forestry and Beekeeping Division and TANAPA both provide data to this database.<br />
Forest Area change<br />
The Eastern Arc has been assessed in terms <strong>of</strong> its total <strong>for</strong>est area in 1955, 1975, 1990, 2000 and this is currently<br />
being updated to 2008. This remote sensing shows that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total <strong>of</strong> 366,000 ha <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>est remaining in 2000,<br />
about 0.9% has been lost (1,910 ha) between years 1990 and 2000 across Eastern Arc Mountains region. This<br />
is an annual rate <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> around 0.1% per annum. Preliminary analysis suggests that loss has continued until <strong>the</strong><br />
present day, but that <strong>the</strong> rates have slowed as reserve boundaries are reached.<br />
Remote sensing <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>est cover provides a useful tool to determine <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> protected areas in retaining<br />
<strong>for</strong>est cover, and also pin point areas <strong>of</strong> encroachment into <strong>the</strong> reserves. Summary statics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>est change in <strong>the</strong><br />
Eastern Arc are below.<br />
Forest area statistics within <strong>the</strong> different <strong>for</strong>est zones <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc Mountains across time (Forestry<br />
and Beekeeping Division 2005)<br />
Zone<br />
Lowland<br />
Historical 1955 1975 2000<br />
Rate <strong>of</strong> change/ year<br />
1955-75 1975-00<br />
montane 3,580 624 361 286 -1.78 -0.95<br />
Submontane 4,861 748 480 440 -1.55 -1.85<br />
Montane<br />
Upper<br />
6,819 1954 1649 1559 -0.73 -0.27<br />
montane 2,734 1410 1309 1262 -0.35 -0.18<br />
It is <strong>the</strong> intention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tanzanian Government that new funding, <strong>for</strong> example from REDD projects in Tanzania,<br />
would be used to make detailed updates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>est area in <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc Mountains over time. Re-assessments<br />
on a five year period are proposed within <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc Conservation Strategy document.<br />
Management Effectiveness. The Forestry and Beekeeping Division has undertaken a detailed assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
status <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reserves in <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc, using <strong>the</strong> ‘Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool’ or<br />
METT. This tool was used in 150 Forest Reserves in <strong>the</strong> Eastern Arc Mountains in 2004/05 (FBD 2005a). A<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Forest Reserves (30) was reassessed in 2009 and results are being analysed. An average score <strong>of</strong><br />
34.4% was obtained in 2004/05, which implies that <strong>the</strong> sites are moderately managed, but with significant area<br />
<strong>for</strong> improved management with more funding, more staffing, better management plans, and better<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources and Tourism