Sequencing
SFAF2016%20Meeting%20Guide%20Final%203
SFAF2016%20Meeting%20Guide%20Final%203
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11th Annual <strong>Sequencing</strong>, Finishing, and Analysis in the Future Meeting<br />
RIGEL: ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR MICROBIAL<br />
ATTRIBUTION, BIOFORENSICS AND<br />
BIOSURVEILLANCE<br />
Thursday, 2nd June 14:20 La Fonda Ballroom Talk (OS‐6.04)<br />
Willy Valdivia 1 , Deepak Sheoran 1 , Juergen Richt 2 , Chester Mcdowell 2<br />
1 Orion Integrated Biosciences Inc., 2 Kansas State University<br />
The use of weapons of mass destruction and in particular biowarfare agents have produced different<br />
appreciations and responses by the international community. From the sixties to the nineties, security<br />
efforts focused on state players and the development of countermeasures against traditional<br />
bioweapons. However, this attention shifted as extremist groups and individuals used pathogens in<br />
acts of bioterrorism and dual use technologies including synthetic biology became available (1). It<br />
is argued that next generation high throughput DNA sequencing offers the possibility of typing<br />
biological samples for microbial infection diagnosis, attribution, bioforensics and biosurveillance.<br />
However, the sensitivity and accuracy thresholds of these analyses can be affected by the error<br />
rate of databases storing information of reference genomes. The ambiguity of metadata associated<br />
with specific strains and the contamination genomic material during sequencing can affect the<br />
confidence of attribution. Although several algorithms have been developed to identify pathogenspecific<br />
genomic signatures, the use of these libraries to determine the taxonomic composition of<br />
a given metagenomics sample is affected by the mutational landscape, the sample size, the number<br />
of DNA reads generated by each sample, the use of phylogenetic distances and statistical weights to<br />
establish a probability match. In order to address these challenges, here we summarize our work<br />
towards the development of an integrated and comprehensive genomic‐based analytical strategy for<br />
known and unknown microbial taxonomic composition assessment. This architecture can establish<br />
accurately intra‐ and interspecies relationships among more than 380,000 known taxonomies.<br />
RIGEL generates motif fingerprints and genomic signatures and during this process; errors in<br />
reference entries are flagged, disambiguated, corrected and/or eliminated. Once this process is<br />
completed RIGEL‐ mtp can be deployed to scan genomic or metagenomics samples from any<br />
sequencing platform. We demonstrate the performance of our system using more than 200 genomes<br />
of Fransicella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis, Burkholderia spp. In addition, we summarize the analysis<br />
of more than 1000 clinical, biological and environmental metagenomic samples sequenced with<br />
different technologies. Our presentation summarizes the benchmarking of sensitivity, speed and<br />
accuracy in the discrimination of known vs. unknown microbial species and/or strains at resolution<br />
levels to support biosurveillance and bioforensics efforts. In addition, we summarize the performance<br />
of our technology during the 2015‐2016 Zika outbreak in South America and the 2016<br />
Elizabethkingia outbreak in the US.<br />
1.W. A. Valdivia‐Granda, Biosurveillance enterprise for operational awareness, a genomic‐based<br />
approach for tracking pathogen virulence. Virulence 4, (Oct 23, 2013).<br />
113