Sequencing
SFAF2016%20Meeting%20Guide%20Final%203
SFAF2016%20Meeting%20Guide%20Final%203
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11th Annual <strong>Sequencing</strong>, Finishing, and Analysis in the Future Meeting<br />
DEVELOPING A PROTOCOL FOR RELIABLY<br />
OBTAINING DNA BARCODE DATA FROM<br />
BIOLOGICAL FRAGMENTS ISOLATED FROM<br />
FORENSIC-LIKE SAMPLES<br />
Wednesday, 1st June 18:30 La Fonda Mezzanine (2nd Floor) Poster (PS‐2a.02)<br />
Kelly A Meiklejohn 1 , James Robertson 2<br />
1 FBI Laboratory/Visiting Scientist Program, 2 FBI Laboratory<br />
Soil is often collected from a subject’s tire, flatbed, shoes and shovel during an investigation of a crime.<br />
Studies documenting the biological diversity in such soil samples using MPS have primarily focused<br />
on a metagenomic approach, in which the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are identified, not<br />
the individual species present. Given that biological organisms only inhabit specific ecosystems or<br />
habitats, identifying the individual species present in a soil sample could assist with geoattribution.<br />
DNA barcoding and the associated public databases (e.g. Barcode of Life Database BOLD and<br />
GenBank) can provide a reliable molecular approach to species‐level identification. While DNA<br />
barcode data has been obtained from pristine DNA extracted from freshly obtained specimens, no<br />
reports are available on DNA extracted from environmentally obtained samples, which may have<br />
fragmented DNA. The primary goal of our research was to develop a protocol to obtain DNA barcode<br />
data from forensic‐like samples. To reach this goal we adapted previously published protocols for<br />
pristine DNA to compromised DNA, isolated from individual biological fragments found in soil<br />
samples. After completing this, we plan to develop a multiplex protocol for DNA barcoding of several<br />
biological specimens simultaneously on a MPS platform.<br />
In late fall, soil samples were collected from 11 locations in the continental US. Where possible,<br />
10 insect and 10 plant fragments were isolated from each sample for downstream extraction and<br />
amplification of the appropriate DNA barcoding regions (total n, 213). As expected, the quantity of<br />
extracted DNA was low (on average