Sequencing
SFAF2016%20Meeting%20Guide%20Final%203
SFAF2016%20Meeting%20Guide%20Final%203
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11th Annual <strong>Sequencing</strong>, Finishing, and Analysis in the Future Meeting<br />
THE EFFECT OF STORAGE TIME AND<br />
TEMPERATURE ON THE RECOVERED MICROBIOME<br />
FROM PUBIC HAIRS<br />
Thursday, 2nd June 15:00 La Fonda Ballroom Talk (OS‐6.06)<br />
Diana Williams<br />
Defense Forensic Science Center<br />
The use of the microbial genetics in forensic science has been limited despite its potential application<br />
in linking individuals. Recent work on the human head and pubic hair microbiome has suggested<br />
that the pubic hair microbiome may be transferred between individuals during sexual intercourse and<br />
detected using high‐throughput sequencing. Because this study was limited in scope, further studies<br />
must be performed to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of this analytical method for criminal<br />
investigations. One aspect that must be addressed involves the impact of storage on the microbiome<br />
of samples recovered for forensic testing. Forensic samples may be stored from days to years in a<br />
variety of conditions before analysis occurs. To test the effects of storage, pubic hair samples were<br />
collected from volunteers and stored at room temperature, refrigerated (4oC), and frozen (‐20oC).<br />
The samples were subject to high‐throughput sequencing at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks,<br />
and 6 weeks post‐collection. The subsequent analysis of the sequence data showed that individual<br />
microbial profiles and the differences in gender were the greatest source of variation between samples.<br />
Within the samples collected from each individual, no statistically significant difference was observed<br />
while time or temperature varied. For short‐term storage (< 6 weeks), the microbiome recovered<br />
was not significantly affected by the storage time or temperature, suggesting that investigators and<br />
crime labs could use already‐existing evidence storage methods.<br />
Disclaimer: The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and<br />
are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the United States Department of the<br />
Army or United States Department of Defense.<br />
115