04.06.2016 Views

Sustainability of European Irrigated Agriculture under Water Framework Directive and Agenda 2000

Sustainability of European Irrigated Agriculture under Water Framework Directive and Agenda 2000

Sustainability of European Irrigated Agriculture under Water Framework Directive and Agenda 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part II<br />

Chapter 6: The case <strong>of</strong> Guadalquivir River Basin (Southern Spain)......................................... 69<br />

1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 69<br />

2. OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................................ 70<br />

3. CASE DESCRIPTION AND CLUSTERS DEFINITION ............................................................................. 71<br />

4. THE MODEL ............................................................................................................................................. 73<br />

4.1. Components <strong>of</strong> the model:................................................................................................................. 73<br />

4.1.1.- Decision variables ................................................................................................................... 73<br />

4.1.2.- Multicriteria <strong>and</strong> multiperiod utility function.............................................................................. 73<br />

4.1.3.- Constraints .............................................................................................................................. 74<br />

4.1.4.- Attributes: Environmental <strong>and</strong> socio-economic indicators ....................................................... 74<br />

4.1.5.- Integration <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> simulation........................................................................................... 75<br />

5. INTEGRATED BASIN WATER DEMAND & IMPACT OF WATER PRICING UNDER AGENDA <strong>2000</strong>..... 76<br />

6. RESULTS BY SCENARIO ........................................................................................................................ 79<br />

6.1. Crop mix............................................................................................................................................. 79<br />

6.2. Economic balance.............................................................................................................................. 80<br />

6.3. Social impact...................................................................................................................................... 82<br />

6.4. <strong>Water</strong> consumption (m 3 /ha) ............................................................................................................... 83<br />

6.5. L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> biodiversity................................................................................................................ 83<br />

6.6. Environmental impact ........................................................................................................................ 84<br />

7. CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................ 86<br />

Chapter 7: The case <strong>of</strong> Duero River Basin (Northern Spain)..................................................... 9<br />

1. CASE STUDY ........................................................................................................................................... 89<br />

2. METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................................... 92<br />

3. WATER PRICING IMPACT. RESULTS FOR THE ”STATUS QUO” SCENARIO (AGENDA <strong>2000</strong>).......... 94<br />

3.1. <strong>Water</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> ................................................................................................................................... 94<br />

3.2. Economic impact................................................................................................................................ 96<br />

3.3. Social impact...................................................................................................................................... 98<br />

3.4. L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> biodiversity................................................................................................................ 99<br />

3.5. Environmental impact ...................................................................................................................... 100<br />

3.6. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 102<br />

4. RESULTS. WATER DEMAND AND OTHER INDICATORS BY SCENARIOS ....................................... 102<br />

4.1. <strong>Water</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> ................................................................................................................................. 102<br />

4.2. Economic impact.............................................................................................................................. 103<br />

4.2.1.- Total Gross Margin (TGM) .................................................................................................... 103<br />

4.2.2.- Contribution <strong>of</strong> irrigated agriculture to GDP (GDPCON)........................................................ 104<br />

4.2.3.- Public subsidies (SUBSID).................................................................................................... 104<br />

4.2.4.- State collection <strong>of</strong> water tariff (PUBCOL) .............................................................................. 105<br />

4.3. Social impact.................................................................................................................................... 106<br />

4.3.1.- Agricultural labour (EMPLOY) ............................................................................................... 106<br />

4.3.2.- Seasonality (SEASONA)....................................................................................................... 106<br />

4.4. L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> biodiversity.............................................................................................................. 107<br />

4.4.1.- Biodiversity (DIVERS) ........................................................................................................... 107<br />

4.4.2.- Soil cover (SOILCOV) ........................................................................................................... 107<br />

4.5. Environmental impact ...................................................................................................................... 108<br />

4.5.1.- Nitrogen balance (BALNIT) ................................................................................................... 108<br />

4.5.2.- Energy balance (BALENE).................................................................................................... 109<br />

4.5.3.- Pesticide risk (PESTRISK) .................................................................................................... 109<br />

4.6. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 110<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 110<br />

Chapter : The case <strong>of</strong> Greece.................................................................................................... 113<br />

1. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................... 113<br />

2. CASE STUDY DESCRIPTION, CLUSTERS DEFINITION ..................................................................... 116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!