07.07.2016 Views

DEVELOPMENT

AFD_2025_English

AFD_2025_English

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 A host of questions<br />

for AFD<br />

Foresighting for Development<br />

Development agencies, steering through future worlds. Afd2025<br />

I<br />

During the exploration of these scenarios for the future, an overarching question often<br />

appeared in the collective work: “What might the ingredients of a new post-SDG paradigm<br />

be?” In addition to the many issues already encompassed by the Sustainable Development<br />

Goals, other key and complementary issues seem to be somewhat ignored by the donor<br />

community. But this does not mean that they will not be at the top of the agenda in ten<br />

or fifteen years.<br />

The combined effect of increasing demand and environmental degradation means that<br />

access to natural resources already is and will remain one of the main challenges facing<br />

humanity for the decades to come. Increasing tension over these resources – an issue<br />

that can only be resolved in the long term – sparks severe short-term crises and even<br />

national or regional conflict, and is an element running through all the scenarios. As a<br />

result, crisis management, peace and stabilization and more generally the need for<br />

increased resilience will likely dominate the development agenda in the medium and<br />

long term.<br />

Global public goods are not only a matter of climate change. In a hyper-connected world,<br />

digital inclusion and access to the global network can also be seen as a new and important<br />

global challenge requiring specific forms of regulation and needing to be treated as a<br />

public good, or even a common good. Certainly, there is a noticeable shift in the debate<br />

from the idea of global public goods (non-exclusive and non-rivalrous) towards the notion<br />

of global commons (non-exclusive but now rivalrous as they are limited). This approach,<br />

inspired by the work of 2009 Nobel Prize winner for Economics Elinor Ostrom, takes into<br />

account the users of a resource, the rules for preserving or producing it and the institutions<br />

best able to implement and enforce the rules.<br />

On another front, the phenomenon of globalization continues to spread in all of the<br />

four scenarios. Its forms differ of course depending on the context (fragmented or<br />

non-territorial), but they take shape in a setting marked by high demographic pressure<br />

with massive impacts on employment, inequality, environment and urban development.<br />

This means that new forms of regulation to ensure sustainable and equitable globalization<br />

will be crucial. They will apply to goods and services, capital and people. For example, we<br />

need to imagine forms of global redistribution (or at least regional) and try to align the<br />

contributions of an ever-expanding array of actors. Regulatory tools such as taxation –<br />

local, national and global –, covering notably the informal sector could be more effectively<br />

taken into account within the range of tools used by donors.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!