DEVELOPMENT
AFD_2025_English
AFD_2025_English
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5 A host of questions<br />
for AFD<br />
Foresighting for Development<br />
Development agencies, steering through future worlds. Afd2025<br />
I<br />
During the exploration of these scenarios for the future, an overarching question often<br />
appeared in the collective work: “What might the ingredients of a new post-SDG paradigm<br />
be?” In addition to the many issues already encompassed by the Sustainable Development<br />
Goals, other key and complementary issues seem to be somewhat ignored by the donor<br />
community. But this does not mean that they will not be at the top of the agenda in ten<br />
or fifteen years.<br />
The combined effect of increasing demand and environmental degradation means that<br />
access to natural resources already is and will remain one of the main challenges facing<br />
humanity for the decades to come. Increasing tension over these resources – an issue<br />
that can only be resolved in the long term – sparks severe short-term crises and even<br />
national or regional conflict, and is an element running through all the scenarios. As a<br />
result, crisis management, peace and stabilization and more generally the need for<br />
increased resilience will likely dominate the development agenda in the medium and<br />
long term.<br />
Global public goods are not only a matter of climate change. In a hyper-connected world,<br />
digital inclusion and access to the global network can also be seen as a new and important<br />
global challenge requiring specific forms of regulation and needing to be treated as a<br />
public good, or even a common good. Certainly, there is a noticeable shift in the debate<br />
from the idea of global public goods (non-exclusive and non-rivalrous) towards the notion<br />
of global commons (non-exclusive but now rivalrous as they are limited). This approach,<br />
inspired by the work of 2009 Nobel Prize winner for Economics Elinor Ostrom, takes into<br />
account the users of a resource, the rules for preserving or producing it and the institutions<br />
best able to implement and enforce the rules.<br />
On another front, the phenomenon of globalization continues to spread in all of the<br />
four scenarios. Its forms differ of course depending on the context (fragmented or<br />
non-territorial), but they take shape in a setting marked by high demographic pressure<br />
with massive impacts on employment, inequality, environment and urban development.<br />
This means that new forms of regulation to ensure sustainable and equitable globalization<br />
will be crucial. They will apply to goods and services, capital and people. For example, we<br />
need to imagine forms of global redistribution (or at least regional) and try to align the<br />
contributions of an ever-expanding array of actors. Regulatory tools such as taxation –<br />
local, national and global –, covering notably the informal sector could be more effectively<br />
taken into account within the range of tools used by donors.<br />
60